Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
hugh3
14y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
Yes, but he's "arguing against it" by reshaping it into a ridiculously extreme and self-evidently-false form.
It's an intellectually dishonest and particularly annoying (yet extremely common) way to argue.
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
Goladus
14y ago
It's a 4 paragraph blog entry meant to be funny and make you think a little bit. It's not trying to be anything more than that. "Intellectually dishonest" is an unfair charge.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse