> I would not ;)
Ha, yeah, that was unclear. My comment was targeted more towards the general HN audience, because _I_ was pretty amazed when I got into that business. "Wait, so you've built the integration, you've built the metrics, you've run A/B tests at various levels for months and months that show beyond a shadow of a doubt that you'll make more money, and you don't want to sign...why?"
>> less eng-focused companies that would pay
> Actually, our experience has been the opposite. The more sophisticated the engineering team, the more they recognize how big of a pain unified search ranking is to build and maintain, and the more they appreciate what we offer.
I see now from the other comments that you're targeting a higher point in the market than I originally thought. Still somewhat surprised that companies at that level would buy rather than build, but I suppose my view of the space is biased since I was only working at places that would want to build that in-house.
> our approach is to include all existing models as features into an omni-model
Makes sense to me if you're trying to be a generalized solution. I assume there's no crossover between any of your customers and you have to build a unique model for each of them?
