undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjdgoesmarching4y ago0 comments

Agreed. This article is pretty clear about its intent: don’t be lulled into a false sense of economic security after the pandemic and build this experience into our understanding of our system.

The first step of any solution is convincing people there is a problem. Not just the obvious “things are bad,” but an understanding that these issues are systemic in a way that challenges American ideology. These articles frustrate HN because they aren’t pitching some technocratic reformism, but instead are seeding ideas about the structure of our society that need to be absorbed before we can hope to change it.

I’m honestly surprised to see this pop up at all here, HN isn’t a crowd that is demographically primed to challenge the assumptions of capitalisms.

0 comments

nightski4y ago

This doesn't challenge assumptions of capitalism in any meaningful way. In fact my impression reading it was how the author seemed to fundamentally misunderstand finance. I'd love to hear thoughts on how it would be done differently, but he doesn't get that far and rather just makes shallow statements.

guerrilla4y ago

> author seemed to fundamentally misunderstand finance.

Without telling us in why you think that, your comment just comes across as throwing insults around. Such a serious accusation requires evidence.

nightski4y ago

It wasn't an insult, it was a critique. Any economy built on promises that can be thrown out at will is just a house of cards. Where do you even start with that? That's just one thing, the article is filled with half thought out premises that when taken to their conclusion fall apart. In reality it is the author making serious accusations that require evidence, not my critique.

1 more reply

jdgoesmarchingOP4y ago

It is one thing to say that you are not convinced by his arguments, but it’s pretty clear that he directly questions our conception of financial markets, markets more broadly, and our definition of “economy” that are key components of capitalism.

In fact, he challenges it so directly that you confuse his intentional materialist characterization of finance as a misunderstanding. Mostly, I think this is a result of our ideology being so pervasive under capitalism that we are accustomed to describing our artificial economic structures as borderline laws of physics. Graeber here is simply trying to insert a wedge into that line of thinking, not propose an entire alternative socioeconomic process.

It’s a bug report, not a pull request.

glogla4y ago

Based on what gets up and downvoted, most of people on HN are ancap or fascists.

I guess it makes sense - startups are gold rush, VC's are the ones giving away shovels for portion of gold should there be any, and founders are people who either found gold or believe they will.

I wonder if most of people have political outlook like this. If they do, it is both sad and comforting, because then the humanity is doomed to kill ourselves via climate change, but we would deserve it.

dang4y ago

> most of people on HN are ancap or fascists

This sort of generalization is notoriously unreliable and subject to cognitive bias. People are far more likely to notice what they dislike, and to weight it more heavily. This produces false feelings of generality:

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

That's why users with opposing views to yours make the opposite generalization [1]. It's not that HN is any different—they simply dislike different things. This is one of the most reliable phenomena I've seen on HN. It's so reliable that one can accurately predict people's politics (or other preferences) simply by flipping a bit on the generalizations they make.

[1] A few are here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26368875.

Edit: it looks like we've had this conversation before:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20343865 (July 2019)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14200623 (April 2017)

mdp20214y ago

Since we are here, Daniel, and also with reference to something I wrote nearby: I think the guidelines should be augmented, in terms of "downvoting without justification should be frowned upon". Otherwise, some would be tempted to just downvote something because they "feel differently": posts are not polls ("how many like strawberry, how many dislike it"). In general, downvoting should be accompanied by posting the underlying reasons - it should take posts evidently inconsistent with the purpose (cheap cheer, cheap joke etc.) to be exceptionally downvoted silently.

I understand HN is pretty conservative in terms of structure and rules, but I believe this should be a general norm that would be consistent with the spirit of the site (intellectuality and promotion of meaningful posts), and beneficial if made explicit.

1 more reply

lliamander4y ago

There are probably quite a few ancaps, and I've seen a fair few communists, but I have yet to see a genuine fascist. That suggests to me your using the term more as a slur than as a word that actually means something.

qsort4y ago

I really hope dang sees this. It's a nice candidate for inclusion in his list of

   [f"most people on HN are {x}" for x in ridiculous_ideologies]

mdp20214y ago

Upvote and downvote do not work that way at HN and should not be interpreted that way without analysis. Here it is not about how you feel: it is about whether you make sense. Experience mostly reflects the principle (some noise must be expected).

dang4y ago

I think you may have a mistaken impression of how downvotes work on HN.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16131314

moistly4y ago

Your claim is fallacious. It is not rooted in any formal study of HN voters or voting outcomes. It is just a story HN members tell themselves to feel special. Reality is, HN is like every other social media platform, and feelings deeply influence voting around here. IMO it is obvious.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

nightski4y ago

guerrilla4y ago

> author seemed to fundamentally misunderstand finance.

Without telling us in why you think that, your comment just comes across as throwing insults around. Such a serious accusation requires evidence.

nightski4y ago

1 more reply

jdgoesmarchingOP4y ago

It’s a bug report, not a pull request.

glogla4y ago

Based on what gets up and downvoted, most of people on HN are ancap or fascists.

I guess it makes sense - startups are gold rush, VC's are the ones giving away shovels for portion of gold should there be any, and founders are people who either found gold or believe they will.

dang4y ago

> most of people on HN are ancap or fascists

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

[1] A few are here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26368875.

Edit: it looks like we've had this conversation before:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20343865 (July 2019)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14200623 (April 2017)

mdp20214y ago

1 more reply

lliamander4y ago

qsort4y ago

I really hope dang sees this. It's a nice candidate for inclusion in his list of

   [f"most people on HN are {x}" for x in ridiculous_ideologies]

mdp20214y ago

dang4y ago

I think you may have a mistaken impression of how downvotes work on HN.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16131314

moistly4y ago

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse