We should be carpet bombing Africa with books, higher-ed, and investment.
No genocide necessary.
The only problem with this plan is that it is far too boring/liberal/naive for a significant portion of decision makers.
Its unclear if that's even possible given that some of these societies face serious issues in terms of equality for women, value of education, fair application of law, systematic corruption and tribalism, etc. Many of these problems are imbued in the religious/cultural bedrock of those places.
Look at what has happened in Afghanistan where after 20 years of Western intervention, the country has reset to its 'default' almost overnight.
We should view the level of development in Europe, NA, East Asia as the exception to the human condition, not the norm.
We need to just skip to the end game: education for women, contraception, abortion, incentives for having zero/one child, no food aid.
Unfortunately The Project For a New American Century did not include Predator drones armed with Kindles preloaded with Wikipedia.
I realize I am over simplifying this here, but Afghanistan was mostly a DOD project when it should have been State.
> We need to just skip to the end game: education for women, contraception, abortion ...
I can agree with this.
> incentives for having zero/one child,
This appears to be built-in to education and economic growth.
> no food aid.
I assume you mean the aid-based long term plans, which have proven problematic. Famine aid should be given in my opinion.
You know why South Korea is prosperous? It recieved more in development aid than all of africa combined
Currently only China is really investing in Africa. While issues you highlighted are serious, these countries were treated very unfairly economically. Do you know what it's like trying to trade with a western megacorp as an african farmer? Can you imagine what its like trying to get a loan to open a business?
After observing the impact the biosphere has experienced with developed countries and developing countries industrializing, do you believe it will support the same for another 4 billion people? My evidence that it will not is enumerated below.
I would agree that policies that help African women become as empowered and wealthy as fast as possible (which reduces the total number of children had [1]) would be the key to success, if done in a manner that does not increase per capita GHG emissions, meat consumption, and all the other negative impacts of per capita wealth growth. If Africa gets wealthy and pumps out CO2 and methane from autos, factory farming, fossil electrical generation, and clear cutting for ag production, that is not a net positive.
[1] https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate#what-explains-the-... (Our World In Data: What explains the change in the number of children women have?)
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/topics/resource-library-h...
https://ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-gas-emissions
https://ourworldindata.org/fish-and-overfishing
https://ourworldindata.org/excess-fertilizer
https://ourworldindata.org/diet-affordability
https://ourworldindata.org/living-planet-index-decline
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/farmers-a...
Population and resource contention are inherently linked.
