undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdekhn4y ago0 comments

he was pissed! and, really didn't like terminal colors when you ran 'ls' (so I showed how to unalias ls)

At this point I don't want to learn any new tricks, either. I'm sticking with bash for the rest of my life.

0 comments

I would guess that he was mostly pissed that things "just changed" without being asked. While these sort of things like the up arrow seem like a no-brainer to many here, showing up for work on Monday and having everything just be different sucks. It's a bad experience, and I can't really blame him for being annoyed.

A lot of times people would be a lot more receptive if you show them "hey, you can use the up arrow like so if you want!" Then they can choose and adapt at their own pace if they want to, and they're in control of their own systems.

dekhnOP4y ago

I told him (this guy was the chair of the informatics department at a major biomedical company) that I understood if he didn't like color ls, because it could be hard to see some colors on a terminal, but that if he wanted to disable arrow key history he was just crazy. Some things are just progress.

jdboyd4y ago

I've been trying to stick with bash for at least 20 years (I did have a brief tcsh phase before that) since a time when sticking with it meant having to install it on every unix system I touched. However, now that MacOS defaults to zsh, I'm starting to wonder if I should summon up the effort to change again.

jolmg4y ago

I think the most noticeable difference is that `$foo` doesn't word-split unless you do `${=foo}`. Beyond that, I don't think one would notice they were using zsh instead of bash. In most ways, zsh is pretty much a superset of bash.

dekhnOP4y ago

personally, I don't have interest in zsh because bash is the default shell in Linux, which is the UNIX system I use (I find mac's unix to be really a weird variant). Mac switching to zsh is just more evidence they're diverting from the mainstream.

handrous4y ago

> I find mac's unix to be really a weird variant

It's closer to BSD than it is to Linux. Not super similar, but closer, especially in ways one tends to notice on the command line.

2 more replies

mprovost4y ago

Apple switched to zsh because newer versions of bash are licensed under GPLv3.

1 more reply

saghm4y ago

IIRC, MacOS had to ship with a fairly old version of bash by default because newer versions have a more copyleft license; I always assumed that their swap to zsh was because they wanted something both up to date and compatible in terms of the license (and the fact that most bash "just works" when you run it in zsh is a plus).

gnubison4y ago

macOS is about as standard of a Unix as you can get, apart from Linux with coreutils.

agumonkey4y ago

what kind of research ? was it computing related or something really different ?

I'm quite shocked

I'm not 20 something either, I'm not chasing new shiny.. but a simple history access (arrows or search) is not an invasive disruptive toy feature..

alas

dekhnOP4y ago

biomedical research, but the person I was helping "had written a kernel disk driver for VAX BSD back in the 80s" and I think they wanted things to more or less stay the same as BSD in the 80s. Which, as far as wishes go, isn't terrible.

agumonkey4y ago

yeah I guess he earned the right to have his ways :)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse