edit: There were some threads on this in the past that are worth checking out. Public service announcements like fire notifications are pushed out by public agencies through these services and they can't go to the intended audience when put behind the wall. Public sector really needs to be compelled to adopt interoperable and freely consumable protocols.
https://www.google.com/search?q=twitter+login+wall+site:news...
“ You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. ”
Limited to friends and completely anonymous people I guess!
The deal was we give them free content for eyeballs to serve ads and they give us a platform for exposure. Requiring login as well is a long trend I don’t like.
1 https://github.com/SimonBrazell/privacy-redirect 2 https://nitter.net/
It is amazing how recording a video going through the product does: the video is full of swear words and cursing. All the things that were invisible suddenly become glaring. All the un-necessary clicking and convoluted flows become torture with cognitive dissonance: "And you can easily just do [steps that clearly are not easy]" and it hits you. Hard.
Hence, some things trigger that agression, especially in a more mature product. For example, I only used YouTube as a consumer of videos, but recently I was putting a lot of videos there in my personal account.
I then created another account and wanted to transfer the videos. Easy, right? No. I looked and looked, and read documentation, and searched on the web, and people said you need to download the videos from one account, then upload them back again to the second account. That can't be, right? I mean I clearly am not the first one to want to do that, and YouTube has existed for ages. There has to be a way I'm stupid enough to have overlooked. I contact them on Twitter, and they link to the documentation that tells you to download videos somewhere, then upload them back again. This is insanity. They're already on YouTube's infra, why do the round trip. Just move the darn thing? I'm not privy to how their infrastructure works, but I have a feeling that this is not the flow I want.
One other example... I have one Android phone that was not physically in the same place as me. I wanted to get the call history (which is backed up in Drive) to urgently call the last number that called me. I could clearly see that the call history was backed up in Drive, and it shows you a "Preview" button that, when you click on, shows a modal that tells you the call history is backed up, and has a button that says "Delete".
I can use Find my Phone and pin-point the location, I can erase it, I can make it ring, I can download all my data and Drive. I can download the device settings. I can Delete a backup, but not download it.
Now I need to wait for tomorrow to be able to get that phone for that call log.
Here's what is interesting: it's almost impossible that I be the first one that hits something like this (either for YouTube or Drive) for products with this many users existing for this long. Moving a video around is practically so obvious, you don't think there would be a documentation for it, let alone a documentation that tells you you can't do it. Heck I'll run my mouth and say it's harder to write and maintain the docs that tell you you can't do it, than add that no-brainer functionality... But then again, I'm running my mouth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Chesterton%27s_fence
The fact there exist reasons something sucks does not make it suck less for the user, even taking into account the user's awareness of these reasons' existence.
It's the "Of course, but maybe...": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLGzFQg_1xc
While if you wanted to move all the videos, couldn't you just have moved the entire channel to a brand account, and then moved the brand account to a different Google account?
What's the really common use case for changing the location of a file from one directory to the other?
>While if you wanted to move all the videos, couldn't you just have moved the entire channel to a brand account, and then moved the brand account to a different Google account?
This blows. Is the word here "just"? Did you read how when I record videos and I say "And you can easily just do [steps that clearly are not easy]" and then it hits me that I'm using "simply" and "just" incorrectly because the steps are not easy.
The above is YouTube specific and requires to know channels and brand accounts. We're talking about moving something from A to B in the same context: like a file from one directory to the other on your interface, you should be able to move a video from one account to the other.
> Years ago, when l was younger and knew better, used to be very aggressive to companies on Twitter and lecture them about how they should do business. It was awful, honestly, and I regret how I behaved.
Even ignoring the obvious typo, it is a little condescending indeed.
> Later, I started my own business. Ghost. And after 9 years of doing this, my perspective changed a great deal.
The cycle is complete.
For example, I note that nobody is contending the facts regarding the customer onboarding and payment process. I also note that the Ghost CEO provided an ad hoc fix with no discussion on whether their policy is good. That implies there will be a next customer who faces the same situation, notwithstanding any obnoxious Twitter followup — and who knows, perhaps another ad hoc fix.
That is beyond unprofessional
This is not news it’s just red meat for clicks.
Its a startup, business, and tech link aggregator
This covers the ramifications of poor customer treatment (business practices), and also acts as a warning to startups that might be looking at ghost as an option for their company's blog
https://web.archive.org/web/20200815091537/https://postapath...
https://web.archive.org/web/20210407222630/https://news.ycom...
I'm annoyed primarily by OP's entitlement and vitriol, and secondarily by the CEO's typos and grammar.
EDIT: not extremely rude and condescending, just unnecessarily condescending
https://twitter.com/amyhoy/status/1449194810749845512/photo/...
From a customer's perspective this is the same thing. This shows a complete lack of empathy with what customers feel when they use your platform.
Stories like these stick with me. When I evaluate using a product, hearing about customer pain like this makes it a no go. Similarly I've told friends that I wouldn't work for a company they've applied to based on bad c-level engagement with customers.
Stuff like this spreads. If you won't fix it for your customers sake, fix it out of self interest.
1. The CEO randomly picks on women on twitter he thinks subtweeted him and writes their bosses
2. The same lock-out mechanism — plus the queue for deletion — happens if eg your credit card expires or has an issue or sometimes randomly
Even Steve Jobs would commonly take customer complaints about Apple's products sent to his E-mail address, and forward them down to engineering with a terse note "Why?"
"Sorry, this is a bug and we're working on fixing it" would have been such a better response.
At the very start the reach is not very enticing... but your home, your rules. (As long as you don't break the law, you'll be fine).
Some people go through life "learning" the same lesson over and over.