• this isn't associated with Jonathan but uses his name
• this isn't associated with Starbucks but uses their logo
• it's already empty
• there's no details to suggest that the previous transfer-balance vulnerability has been closed – only that it's now harder to optimize the attack by knowing when the active card has a fat balance
• the usable card number will change regularly so as to confuse both attackers and users, and putting primarily the site maintainer in full control of all monies deposited
What is this supposed to achieve? Are you really Sam Odio trying to prove another point?
My name is Jonathan and I give this guy permission to use it. If you don't want someone to name their knock-off after your product, maybe don't name it after a common first name :)
By calling this "Jonathan's Card 2.0", and their explicit references, they're clearly trying to portray this as an official successor from the same agent(s). If Jonathan Card "1.0" cared about this, he could object on both legal and ethical grounds.
And the balance still shows as empty. It's probably a scam. (Or someone has already found a way to siphon the money off immediately.) I don't care personally, its just $10 for me, but I thought you all might like to know the results I got.
Edit: Never mind, it just took about 10 minutes for the main page to update. Here's to the good people and coffee drinkers of the world. ;)
I just hope it's still around by Friday so I can put some money on it.
Er... Wasn't the API part of the experiment? It wasn't really a mistake then if the experiment was undefined.
Hopefully this lasts and doesn't get abused.
I will put $10 on it next Friday (if it lasts that long).
Edit: donated using my iPhone. Neat project, great hack.
