undefined | Better HN

0 pointsheurisko4y ago0 comments

Who decides what speech is radical enough to compromise the privacy of users?

And if speech is "radical" meaning to the point of illegality, shouldn't the legal system decide, rather than the court of public opinion?

0 comments

Radical as in pushed to the extremes, not radical in thought to the general population. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc&t=1s

That I've been DONT MENTION ARROWS ON HN on this post is a good indication we're not close to solving this by a long shot.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsheurisko4y ago0 comments

Who decides what speech is radical enough to compromise the privacy of users?

And if speech is "radical" meaning to the point of illegality, shouldn't the legal system decide, rather than the court of public opinion?

Radical as in pushed to the extremes, not radical in thought to the general population. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rE3j_RHkqJc&t=1s

That I've been DONT MENTION ARROWS ON HN on this post is a good indication we're not close to solving this by a long shot.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse