Besides, there have been crazy ideas floated like making an issue out of vaccinating people who have already had & recovered from COVID. They're less likely to spread the coronavirus around than any other demographic.
I'm not sure if you chose this binary line of thinking or if it was by accident, but you present the outcomes based on a 0 or 100% efficacy when it's not the case.
It matters/ed what other people do, and if more people got vaccinated (or could do so earlier) it might've stopped covid. Whether it could now is a crap-shoot, but more protection is always better than less.
It isn't, immune systems are quite complicated:
"White House immunologist Dr Anthony Fauci offered the warning while giving an update on efforts to develop vaccines at an online US Senate hearing on Tuesday. He said: ‘I must warn that there’s also the possibility of negative consequences, where certain vaccines can actually enhance the negative effect of the infection.’ Dr Fauci later explained that in rare cases people vaccinated against a condition could end up contracting the virus they thought they’d been protected against, and falling more seriously-ill with that disease as a result" [0]
We should be letting people make their own choices.
[0] https://metro.co.uk/2020/05/12/americas-top-coronavirus-doct...
