Agree but I want to clarify I put it as a
reverse-BrandonM (aside from its notoriety) because BrandonM (and the rest of news.yc agreed with them by voting the comment to the top) at the time wrote:
'It does not seem very "viral" or income-generating. I know this is premature at this point, but without charging users for the service, is it reasonable to expect to make money off of this?'
dhouston did remember to thank BrandonM for their feedback, so that's there too: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16660140