You mean implicit type conversions? That's a thing you can get somewhat used to. But it throws off beginners and can introduce super weird bugs, because they hide bugs in weird ways, even if you are more experienced. Yes, I find strong typing strictly better than weak typing.

An even better example of this would be Excel, the horror stories are almost incredible.

So even if your environment is dynamic, you want clarity when you made a mistake. Handling errors gracefully and hiding them are very different things. The optimal in a dynamic world is to facilitate reasoning while not restricting expression.