There goes that "for the greater good" incentive for getting vaccinated. And people are still thinking vaccines should be mandatory?
It seems that the only people who don't spread now are people who have previously had COVID-19 or those who have cross reactive immunity from a previous coronavirus strain. Even better if you've gotten a single dose in addition to a natural infection.
I propose robust research and testing which will prove natural immunity (not antibody testing, long term immunity such as B and T-cells) for use with any kind of potential "passport" for travel, business, etc. The latest data from the article is proving that natural immunity (which is lifelong and protects against variants) is king.
Emphasis added. These are a smaller percentage than unvaccinated people who get infected. So if you cherry-pick that group (who got vaccinated then got infected) and then say "look, it's the same as the unvaccinated", well that's not giving an accurate picture.
> latest data from the article is proving that natural immunity (which is lifelong and protects against variants) is king.
For the benefit of people reading this, this idea that "natural is better" does not appear to be correct:
"The evidence shows that protective antibodies generated in response to an mRNA vaccine will target a broader range of SARS-CoV-2 variants ... compared to antibodies acquired from an infection."
https://directorsblog.nih.gov/2021/06/22/how-immunity-genera...
"Vaccination offers longer, stronger immunity"
https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/why-covid-19-vaccine...
"Why a vaccine can provide better immunity than an actual infection"
https://theconversation.com/why-a-vaccine-can-provide-better...
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-you-need-to-get-v...
It still seems to reduce the number of hospitalizations, thus probably preventing a health care collapse which was the original point of lockdowns.
