https://tealpod.com/compressor/index.html
Thanks in advance.
The "pay what you want" model is very tough. Most people "want" to pay nothing.
You have (putative) email addresses for some of your downloaders. You could ask them. Perhaps as part of a short survey?
It's currently easier to do the "free download" than use the pay option. You could remove the "free download" link and have only "Pay what you want $", defaulting to $15 as it is now, with an option to pay $0.
You could switch to nagware.
I'm hoping that my giving feedback here might encourage others to chime in, even if only to explain that I'm wrong. ;)
I will consider your suggestion of removing the free download link.
Thank you for taking time to give me feedback.
trivial cost * many > non-trivial cost
Sure your program asks only a bit of money. But people use lots of free software which asks for a bit of money.Some of it is not useful enough to warrant payment. But it has the same model.
How does someone execute a consistent approach? How do they treat everyone equally?
The simplest thing is not paying. Then there is no fretting over "should I pay?" No wondering "since I paid for A, should I pay for B?"
If you want money, require payment for download. Simple and tells you whether you are actually building something people will pay for. Requiring payment is a reliable form of feedback. Good luck.