I'm intrigued by the process that results in this being reported by a nominally left-leaning paper, but leaving out all the details that make it clear that it's left wing bias at work.
> "You can't cite the Daily Mail or Fox News on socio-political issues."
> On today's #LDTV, Wikipedia co-founder @lsanger
claims that the website's Left-wing bias is so strong that publications like the Daily Mail and Fox are "banned".
Don't miss https://unherd.com/thepost/wikipe
Is it purely monetary in that if they'd included any of those details in the headline then no one would have clicked? The right-leaning papers and source of the video all thought that was the main point of his argument, but this newspaper leaves it all quite vague.
