undefined | Better HN

0 pointsgiovannibonetti4y ago0 comments

When you said "idempotency mismatch" you were meaning impedance mismatch, right?

0 comments

tome4y ago

Strange if so because it's the "Object-relational impedance mismatch" not the "Static type-relational impedance mismatch".

Your are right! Thank you for correcting me.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsgiovannibonetti4y ago0 comments

When you said "idempotency mismatch" you were meaning impedance mismatch, right?

tome4y ago

Strange if so because it's the "Object-relational impedance mismatch" not the "Static type-relational impedance mismatch".

Your are right! Thank you for correcting me.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse