There are in fact legitimate small inventors who must approach large companies, and that situation predates the hardware and software industries, but it was software and hardware people that created this idea of the "patent troll". If there was a "bad" situation that existed before Intellectual Ventures was founded, no solution was offered by those who were negatively affected. Rather, the approach taken was "If you can't beat `em, join `em." One could argue, as a result, the situation went from bad to worse.
I'd say the business idea was created by the govt. Finding new ways to profit via exploiting the laws will always happen sooner or later if they exist.
Hardware and software are perhaps unusual because the patent office has such a divergent idea of what is and novel and obvious to experts versus reality, presumably because computer technology moves so fast.
https://www.eff.org/document/memo-uc-regents-re-patent-licen...
What would people call this. What is this LLC actually going to produce, besides licensing revenue or litigation.
(But you probably have a point that if patents are legitimate than an otherwise ethical patent troll would also be legitimate)
I assume the patent troll approach would be that they're returning value to their investors, while following the law as it stands.
We should not through out the baby with the bathwater....
So is copyright, without them both the concept of IP dissapears.
Patents at least have to be usefull, and documented publically for future use.
Copyright of code by comparison is an abomination, it does something to your smartphone and data, you have no right to inspect it or change it.