undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbccdee5y ago0 comments

Yeah, people aren't rational. But when people start behaving dangerously (making legal threats, etc), I think they ought to be acting rationally — especially if they're in a position of power.

So when a CEO makes legal threats against some random dev's side project, seemingly out of a sense of entitlement to the very idea of a polyglot code sandbox, I'm going to be pretty harsh.

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

ska5y ago· 1 in thread

> I'm going to be pretty harsh.

What exactly are you skeptical about? It's read to me like you were disbelieving the story because you didn't believe the CEO would act that way. To the contrary, it's entirely plausible (regardless of truth).

We can completely agree that people ought to be behaving more rationally, but empirically in enough cases, they don't.

bccdeeOP5y ago

I'm skeptical that "the situation is muddier than it appears in the blog post." It seems clear to me that the CEO is acting irrationally, and given that, nothing about the story seems out-of-place. So I'm going to be pretty harsh towards the CEO in not extending them the benefit of the doubt, because I don't see any perspective where they're behaving appropriately.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse