undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmturmon14y ago0 comments

Thanks for that link.

People should know that there's a lot of turmoil in the astrophysics community about JWST. In current plans, JWST overruns have resulted in elimination or long-term postponement of all other NASA astrophysics missions in the next decade. Even non-flight-project research is being cut significantly.

0 comments

nate_meurer14y ago

I am utterly incapable of intelligently commenting on the cost effectiveness of this telescope, but I will note that all of NASA's current money problems could be solved by allocating it just a tiny fraction of what we instead wasted in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I'm sorry to keep talking about these fucking wars, but it really does make me want to cry.

T-hawk14y ago

Expanding NASA's budget by 2x or even 10x would not solve its problems. Parkinson's Law is as applicable to NASA as to any other organization. JWST and the other missions will overrun any amount of time and budget allocated to them.

nate_meurer14y ago

I had that thought as I was writing the comment, which is why I added the word "current". But you're probably right to a large degree, and my only answer is that, to the extent that larger budgets don't decrease NASA'a fiscal discipline, the investment is better made there.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsmturmon14y ago0 comments

Thanks for that link.

0 comments

nate_meurer14y ago

I'm sorry to keep talking about these fucking wars, but it really does make me want to cry.

T-hawk14y ago

nate_meurer14y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse