Of course, it's like many people in American health insurance are making a buck off a system that bankrupts the sick or maybe people who are worried about climate change but still work for a company that disproportionally exacerbates the issue because they have too many other personal priorities to account for. Also like these other issues, there's creeping normalcy and once the effects are apparent, it's very difficult (if not impossible) to rollback. This is more a systemic conversation in that individuals who find themselves having to choose between concrete, personal growth and more nebulous (often controversial) public good can't be expected to be accountable on both levels in many cases. I don't understand the argument that people raising ethical or even general concerns about their work/industry should quit and get replaced, and then point to their replacement as the reason the original concern was unfounded.