*According to the article.
From my understanding, there's no specific rule about anything like that. "Show HN is for something you've made that other people can play with. HN users can try it out, give you feedback, and ask questions in the thread." [0] Generally people on here care only if there is an issue about a conflict of interest in some way. I am sure there are rules about spamming but flagging usually takes care of that situation.
There are accounts which submit only their own content, and that frequently. These tend to get marked as spam, the sites blocked, and often the profiles are banned.
If you submit a mix of sources, including occasionally your own, you should be fine.
Blogs don't qualify as "Show HN": https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
(Speaking as an HN reader. I'm not part of YC.)
So I guess there's your answer.
I think it's against human ambition to surrender to entropy. Religion has emphasized surrender as a way to find peace but I don't personally see how those words do anything except placate. There's no deeper meaning to surrendering, other than what someone gives to it. Progress isn't made in calm waters.
To a certain degree, it is looking at different sides of the same coin. Surrendering to a higher power to find meaning in entropy as opposed to surrendering to the fact that there might not be a deeper meaning or higher power. Giving up on feeling "peace" is an option too.
Surrender is not resignation, it is acceptance. You have to acknowledge and then emotionally accept what truly is, in order to be able to effectively construct a different future.
http://www.av8n.com/physics/thermo/entropy.html#sec-s-vs-dis...
Also, the system that we see having an increase in entropy is [the Sun + the photons it emitted], not just the Sun.
[1] https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/I/bo353393...