Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
newaccount2021
5y ago
0 comments
Save
Share
That statement is simply the plural form of the same circular argument.
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
rusk
5y ago
Not really. In my version the energy wastage is a means to an end. Not the end in itself. In particular, energy usage is not coupled to value. It is “collateral” damage. You could in theory replace it with some other proof of work ...
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse