> So what you're saying is that there was a process for figuring out the inevitable ambiguities, and you just disagree with the ruling?

The fact that what constitutes “reasonable” and “technical” QoS is ambiguous and strongly dependent on popular opinion is a huge design smell for net neutrality legislation.

> As an aside, I also don't see the "reasonable", "technical" justification for throttling bittorrent anymore than throttling https.

If 20% of your customers are using 80% of your network capacity because of BitTorrent then yes, throttling them is both technical and reasonable.