There's even federally mandated shower flow rate [1]. Just leave this shit up to the states.
[1] https://www.waterpik.com/shower-head/blog/shower-head-gpm/#:....
from your link, some states can set lower.
| To conserve resources and save money, some state and local governments mandate even lower GPM flow rates than the federal regulation.
| Examples of national and local regulations include:
| * New York City and the state of Colorado require a maximum of 2.0 GPM
| * California, Washington, and Hawaii require a maximum of 1.8 GPM
would you have states set a min flow rate?
Congress itself is mostly too dysfunctional to micromanage on that level.
I absolutely hate this state rights argument. I for one would gladly support repealing the words the states from the tenth amendment.
States don’t have magical rights. People have rights.
I have a feeling anyone who supports “state rights” would also support the idea of “separate but equal”.
Please do not associate yourself with the hypocrites who are all for state rights until California wants to regulate automobile emissions.
People have rights. And the most straightforward way to cater for these rights is to split people into groups. If 90% of people in Alabama don't want weed legalized, don't force it upon them. Save the vigor for what's really important.
Nothing. Ideally it would be at the federal level so California wouldn't have to do it though.
> If 90% of people in Alabama don't want weed legalized, don't force it upon them.
No. The hypothetical ninety percent of people in Alabama have no right to restrict the rights of the other ten percent. It doesn't affect them. They should stay out of it.
My castle - my rules.
I have close to 100% right to restrict smoking in my home.
I have close to 0% right to restrict smoking on the whole planet.
The boundary is somewhere in between.
