undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbaq4y ago0 comments

fair points, but one could argue that USSR wasn't necessarily a socialist state. it was totalitarian, which somehow gets more confused with socialist the further west you go and ask.

0 comments

cies4y ago

> USSR wasn't necessarily a socialist state

it wasn't communist (defined as: no money, no classes, no state). it was commi thoug

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsbaq4y ago0 comments

fair points, but one could argue that USSR wasn't necessarily a socialist state. it was totalitarian, which somehow gets more confused with socialist the further west you go and ask.

0 comments

cies4y ago

> USSR wasn't necessarily a socialist state

it wasn't communist (defined as: no money, no classes, no state). it was commi thoug

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse