>If your client sincerely fears that this depiction is too realistic to be perceived as parody, Krazam’s video should be the least of its reputational concerns.
Followed by screenshots from the video showing the DocuSign "Docustage" and Meme Center (Sponsored by GE). At the end of the video itself, the Coachella participant is banned from the event because their "vibes are not compliant with the Coachella policy".
Glad EFF stepped in here to protect small creators such as this one.
It says a lot on the ego of the producer of the product. [Also that they're treating it as a product.. yes metallica corporate I see you] It completely disreguards of how the individual relates to it and is more focused on control on how they want things.
That whole philosophy you should expect in dictatorships, not in cultures that embrace free expression.
Ragging on them simply because they want to put ground rules down, so everyone can have fun, is pretty immature. Yes concerts need rules. The venue can be held liable for certain things drunk/high dumbasses are going to do. You need to be specific about what rules are so dictatorish or you just sound like a 15 year old pissed off with their parents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67sfZfreOrU
These guys have a lot of relevant content for HN types, they're really funny.
Also he forgot .. stocks only go up.
Cease and Desist over Instagram.
Actual notice ("I sent it, you acknowledge you got it") suffices for most notice requirement, regardless of circumstances of sending and receiving.
Some statues/rules are more specific, but it's impossible to answer that without a more specific question.
I don't always like the way EFF portrays a given cause in their website/blog postings: They often seem over-simplified and lacking the detail necessary to understand the specifics of the issue in the interest of soliciting donations. Their legal filings, on the other hand, are pretty universally fantastic & skewering of the opposition.
Backfire!
“Woo woo woo woo woo woo woo - Barbra Streisand.”
For example the Texas AG wrote this in a letter to Austin when he decided to sue them for overriding the state mask rescinding: https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/087ed6e3bf8591d7...
"We have already taken you to court under similar circumstances. You lost. If you continue to flout the law in this manner, we’ll take you to court again and you will lose again. "
(a part of the lawsuit was just thrown out a few hours ago)
The youtube link still laughing!! .. the link is IN THE CODIFIED REPLY.. to the cease and desist.. I can't.. this is too funny
