"What should I do if I think that my personal data protection rights haven’t been respected? "
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo...
"European Data Protection Board Members"
As I understand, deactivation is temporary, deletion erases all data.
But if people did delete their accounts and Facebook didn't erase the private data, aren't there consequences to this?
That's the problem, what we or regulators understand may well be very different to what actually happens
> aren't there consequences to this
A slap on the wrist at best, I'd bet my house on it
Another option would be that someone else has that number listed for their account. Has Facebook always required confirmation that a number is valid? I saw one my friends' numbers in the data except the account had a different name.
A few months ago some criminals social engineered themselves past my bank's security as well. The first I learned about this was a funny conversation (by phone!) from an actual Deutsche Bank employee asking me if I recently changed my address and phone number and whether I opened ten new accounts. "eh no?!..." Basically their fraud detection system kicked in before these people did any damage. I made a point of not doing anything else than confirming information they already knew (like my old address, email address) and asked for an on site meeting to discuss things in more detail. I realized instantly I had no way of verifying anything I was being told on the phone and might very well be talking to a scammer. As it turns out this was for real and the person actually managed to find my "old phone number" in some archive. Otherwise all my contact information had already been changed by the scammers. Thankfully I answered that call. Apparently, this happened to several people.
Basically, what happened was some persons just called the bank's help desk, asked them to reset my online banking access codes, and then somehow intercepted the pin codes (thanks Deutsche Post) before they reached me. The theory is that somehow the security of the distribution system was compromised. As far as I an tell, nobody broke into my building or mailbox. Then started they using them to change my address, etc. They got caught only when they created sub accounts and started transferring money.
Email has decent spam filtering, and I think that kind of cat-mouse system will persist. That said, there's "room" for more whitelisting.
In principle, "pay me a small fee if you're not on my list, if I put you on my list now it's free" would work well (optionally refund someone who contacts you out of the blue that you approve of), but there's a lot of both engineering and social details between where we are now and such a system.
It doesn't take much cost friction to deter mass spamming. I don't think much problem would be left behind from the handful of overconfident spammers who think that they can bust the odds and it's worth 25 cents a message or something.
You could likely get a far off area coded number.
Ive had to wildcard block my area code (since I don't live there anymore) which captures 95% of my daily spam calls - but people can still leave a message to break through my wall if it's truly urgent. I don't see how this could work with SMS.
Even message requests on facebook/messenger have problems where you are unlikely to even see the request unless you check regularly.
There are a lot of these little edge-cases. Journalists, lawyers representing class action suits, government id expiring, and so on.
Just wait for the deepfaked voice call scammers. Their best bet is to work up the hierarchy; a tiny local police station knows how to get in touch with a bigger police station that can contact an embassy, etc.
> There are a lot of these little edge-cases. Journalists, lawyers representing class action suits, government id expiring, and so on.
All of these use-cases allow someone to spend the time to contact you via your preferred contact method, whatever that might be.
[0]. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/10/twitter-uninentionally...
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/alexkantrowitz/how-saud...
Collecting this data is an accident (or murder?) waiting to happen.
Even more frustratingly, there is a form to appeal a ban. After filling out that form, I got a confirmation mail stating that Twitter will "respond as soon as possible", or in other words, never.
I do not understand why they bothered to implement all that hijinks to waste my time. Simply disallowing signups without phone number would have been much simpler and less dishonest.
Lots of likes, no RTs or posts though.
FB data can be the only possible source of that spam.
The spam is always trying to sell male enhancement products to 'Karen'. Anyone know how to stop this SMS spam crap?
But I have a similar, but unrelated to FB, problem in that every month I get an offer to work as a nurse in Norway from different agencies. I figured they scraped some "find the number"-site here in Sweden long ago and since my mothers name was on my bill I guess my number somehow came up under her name.
It's been annoying for years but since my mother had a some (non-corona) medical problems last year it has been downright infuriating at times. Anyone know how to make it stop when there is a bunch of different agencies messaging you?
I think it's pretty hard to stop incoming spam when the number itself has been made public.
The only options I know would be: a. Play whack and mole, report the number to the authority in your country that handles this kind of spam activity. b. Use some kind of mobile application that filter out the spam SMS. This one is kinda hit and miss, since the number data is coming from community reports, so some spam might pass the filter. And there might be some false positives from the spam filter.
I also would like to hear if there's alternative solution for this problem, other than changing the phone number itself.
The only way I can see striking back at these spam calls is to pick up the call and waste their time, because its expensive. Also if I pick up that means someone else is not getting scammed. I try to get as far along in the scam process as possible.
It's not perfect, but it has had an impact on the amount of spam I receive.
Anyway it's probably good practice to recycle your number every few years, and not use it for 2FA to make switching numbers a lot easier. Who knows what services I'll be locked out of once I change, let's hope not too many.
I'll never do that again. It happened shortly after ditching social media and I just about all of my contact info and I haven't been in touch with some old friends because of that since then.
Even if you had the time to transfer your contacts, etc, something will inevitably get missed.
Hell, I've updated family and friends to an email address I've been using for closer to a decade and they still email the old one...
A good chunk of people will probably communicate mostly on platforms like WhatsApp/Telegram/Discord/whatever that don't need numbers at all or facilitate switching of numbers without your contacts having to do anything. I don't think that will constitute anywhere near the majority of people across the world though, switching numbers will definitely be a pain for most.
Ironically Twilio of all places forced SMS 2FA on all accounts earlier this year.
As in, one day you could no longer log into your twilio account without giving them a phone number. You are locked out until you do.
Ironic in a few ways ...
First, twilio numbers are not mobile numbers - they are voip numbers - and cannot be used for most 2FA authentication services because they cannot receive messages from short codes. So it's ironic that twilio forces you to use a non-twilio number for their 2FA.
Second, many twilio use-cases (like mine) involve building a twilio infrastructure to replace my existing phones/numbers ... and now that is broken from the bottom up because I have to use a mobile phone with a fixed provider just to use twilio.
The bottom line is: none of this is for me or my safety and security. Twilio has a spam problem and that spam problem is very hard to solve. Forced pairings of physical phones and SIM cards is just a desperate way to throw sand in those gears to slow it down a little bit.
Really?
Every phone number is already known to anyone who wants to get it.
When ordering online, always, always, always use a fake number, it's not required. Always use a fake name where possible. Sure, you need to provide that as a 'billing' address, but in some cases it stops other third parties getting that info (on eBay you can type a random name to ship to, I've had fun with this :) ).
But lastly, LOL. Giving your data to facebook this is what you deserve, and for society accepting facebook as a standard part of life.
When do we protest to delete the website?
Don't do this if you order anything that doesn't ship small parcel. The freight company may need to contact you and it will complicate matters and delay your final delivery.
Until something's gone wrong in the process and they need to call you to clarify/fix it. (happens regularly to me due to address suffixes not propagating correctly through crappy systems)
Huge shoutout to/for privacy.com. Been using for over a year now and it's been a fantastic service.
Looks like its worked here.
When I make a Facebook account, usually for my living complex's community or a bunch of Gen-Xer's doing a burning man thing, I use a new email or new phone number for signup and one time passwords.
I don't let it get access to my contacts, assuming I inadvertently installed the Facebook app on a phone.
Doesn't look like they meaningfully go deeper than that.
I find the social graph to be very fungible, so if I really ever want to recreate it I can just add my phone number or give any app access to my contacts. This knowledge also lets me not be married to any of these services.
I'm very content downloading the account data and then deleting the account.
In fact Facebook used to show creepy suggestions when such cross-pollination of data occured, like “Click here to confirm that XXXXXX is your phone number!”, but they stopped doing that a few years ago.
I also don't consider my phone number "sensitive" information I want to keep secret - it's already quasi-public and something I give out when I want people to be able to contact me.
I grew up looking people up in the physical phone book when I lost their number, fwiw.
Turns out the phone number is the best unique identifier and is the perfect key for joining up lots of disparate sources of data. It's the kind of thing that you could either sell directly or use as an index to determine things like your estimated income.
It wouldn't surprise me if Facebook has had multiple technical methods for devising/stealing and disingenuous "protect your account" campaigns for willingly turning over users phone numbers.
I have used it a few times to contact people for whom immediate contact was preferable to facebook post/message.
Why not? When I grew up, we had a phone book listing everyone’s name and address and phone number so you could find them to contact.
I consider all of this essentially public information and would rather make it easier for people I know to contact me. If it gets lost in a breach, whatever. I already get plenty of junk mail because I give to charities and they sell my address.
It'll be fun if/when any of these numbers can prove they requested Facebook to delete their data under GDPR.
I wonder if the benefits of haveibeenpwned outweights this.
e: To be clear, the Ashley Madison, and Adult Friend Finder (both breaches) are denoted on the list as not being publicly searchable.
My phone number isn't in here anywhere, so lucky me, but it doesn't make a difference. The State of Texas finally forced me to get a Texas driver's license in order to continue being able to vote, and the State of Texas sells your address and phone number to marketers once they have it, so my number is trash now anyway. 99 out of 100 texts and calls are either politicians or people claiming to want to buy one of my houses. I basically no longer use a phone except when my dad calls.
I guess the plus side there is I'm somewhat immune from whatever location tracking can't be disabled since I don't even take my phone with me most of the time when I go anywhere, but that was an old habit from when I worked in a SCIF and couldn't bring a phone with me anyway.
Now I'm wondering how this actually plays with legislation such as CCPA or GDPR, as it is quite revealing even without the more delicate sites mentioned here.
> And finally, one last note on the data load process: At the time of publishing this blog post, all phone numbers beginning with international codes 4, 6, 8 and 8 have completed loading. The other codes are in progress and may take several hours more before they're searchable.
US numbers begin with international code 1, and it seems that they aren't yet searchable.
I was surprised that mine hadn't come up, since I've had a few Facebook accounts over the years with my phone number, and this explains it.
For anybody getting a miss and wondering if they messed up the formatting, my US number is coming up now, formatted with a vanilla +1-123-456-7890.
I'm increasingly confident that this breach/leak has come about mostly through the privacy search setting (buried in Facebook's privacy settings - https://www.facebook.com/settings?tab=privacy -) which allows "Everyone" to search for a number in order to find your profile if so enabled.
This is a bit like an option that PayID/Osko (instant bank transfers) in Australia allows - one could bash through random mobile numbers and discover more information than just the number. I've always found this option to be creepy because I don't people who might otherwise have my phone number legitimately to be able to facestalk me.
Please note that this is separate to displaying contact info publicly on one's profile page - yes, there is a dizzying array of different privacy settings on Facebook. Would Mark Zuckerberg provide have ever displayed his phone number publicly? I doubt it. But would he have allowed others who already have his phone number to search for him on Facebook? I'd say almost certainly yes.
I used to use Facebook more than I like to admit and I have provided my phone number to Facebook in the past, yet have managed to avoid being in this breach, whereas some people I know are in the data set. This means I'm quite sure that I'm not returning false negatives with the search.
[0] https://datastudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/afa08373-621e-4e...
I've gotten spam calls since the breach, sometimes in the middle of the night while trying to sleep. That's distress.
[1] https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo...
In other cases, Facebook may get the phone number because someone uploaded their address book/contacts to it. This information shouldn’t be in the user’s public/private profile (even though Facebook would store it internally, use it to figure out other connections and “show relevant ads”).
> "Facebook Settings > Privacy > How people can find and contact you > Who can look you up using the phone number you provided?"
Is/was it set to "Everyone"?
The process is spelled out here: https://haveibeenpwned.com/Privacy
https://www.troyhunt.com/the-facebook-phone-numbers-are-now-...
Once I prepended Canada’s country code: (1XXXxxxXXXX) it worked.
Maybe this can be fixed with some simple communication? Ie “No result —- ensure you enter your full phone number including country code”
> At the time of publishing this blog post, all phone numbers beginning with international codes 4, 6, 8 and 8 have completed loading. The other codes are in progress and may take several hours more before they're searchable.
So I was like: what about another 8?
Edit: Actually, it is "4, 6, 7 and 8"! cf. https://twitter.com/troyhunt/status/1379377818618884098
> they bear the moral responsibility for all the people who will be affected by this
Facebook should not be held responsible for dictatorships and totalitarian regimes killing people - even if they use Facebook's leaked data to do so. It's quite unfortunate, but the responsible party to blame is still the people actually doing the killing.
Some of the leaks are from companies I don't even know, that work behind the scenes aggregating information. Particularly for those I'd like to see what was leaked. For the services I actually used directly I have a clearer idea.
Not it would not solve that since HIBP would have to store that data (which they currently don't) and thus might be subject to leaks themselves.
Now I see my phone number was part of the breach. I am so fed up with Facebook.
> Compromised data: Dates of birth, Email addresses, Employers, Genders, Geographic locations, Names, Phone numbers, Relationship statuses
This is annoying, but I just can't get too worked up about it. I assume that anything I tell Facebook is already more or less public.
Interestingly, several cellphone numbers I know to be present in one set of leak data which start with international code 4 are not detected by HaveIBeenPwned.
Please review the footnote of the post, just above the comments, before assuming that your HIBP negative result is valid.
tl;dr; search your real phone number but exclude consecutive numbers to filter out auto-generated pages:
"(212)555-1239" -1240 -1238
Using this I was able to find all my info (and much more) on sites like: https://www.fastpeoplesearch.com/I expect many of these "people search" sites to link to your fb profile soon using this breach.
I expect the more sophisticated ones to crawl all your social media accounts (twitter, chat apps, etc) by abusing reverse look up using your phone number.
It does show up for companies I've trusted more though - Dropbox, Linux Mint, XKCD (md5 really?), Forbes, etc.
The only information exposed to me is that the person with that number, has a FB profile. If I am to trust FB (which I don't - for nothing) is that FB has this person's number and lost it. I place no reliance to anything that FB states. For all I know that person is a WhatsApp user and the FB branch 'stole' the number and added that to their FB account (yes, I know this is not how data works, but this is how FB works).
(semi-rant follows - apologies)
There is a mention of 2FA/MFA in another comment. I wouldn't be surprised if FB already has a 'super profile', where all data by FB-WA-IG are merged. I believe that would be a nightmare to do, but hey, FB is good at nightmares.
Edit: I feel this is a semi "Ashley Madison" moment. People who have a 'secret' FB profile may get busted by their BFs/GFs.