undefined | Better HN

0 pointssmokey_circles5y ago0 comments

>The court skirted that question, and instead focused on whether it was fair use

Because the federal courts already ruled that APIs are eligible for copyright [0].

Google wanted to overturn the ruling that they were in violation of copyright and argued they used Java's APIs fairly under copyright law.

The court will not answer questions not put to it, and Google (I presume) felt they had a better shot at getting the court to agree it was fair usage, rather than arguing copyright should not apply here.

0: https://www.paleudislaw.com/federal-circuit-rules-that-apis-...

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

dragonwriter5y ago

> The court will not answer questions not put to it, and Google (I presume) felt they had a better shot at getting the court to agree it was fair usage, rather than arguing copyright should not apply here.

This is false; Google appealed on both copyrightability and fair use, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear both issues.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse