undefined | Better HN

0 pointshutzlibu4y ago0 comments

WW2 (at least in europe) was pretty much a result of the harsh on the loosers of WW1 treaty of Versailles. So germany did not feel much love from the world - the world was demanding lots of pay as reparations every year(I think it was originally planned till 1990!). They felt they have to get strong to reclaim what was theirs. (Very simply put)

0 comments

chrisseaton4y ago

No matter how much 'love' you give, someone somewhere will want to take more from you. And if you have nothing to defend yourself with they're going to walk all over you.

What 'love' do you think the US should have given to Japan to stop them attacking?

What do you do when you've given all your 'love' and have nothing left and they ask for more or they'll attack? You need a military and it needs to be good.

ativzzz4y ago

> What 'love' do you think the US should have given to Japan to stop them attacking?

Oil and military equipment.

> After the Japanese invasion of China in 1937 and French Indochina in 1940, the United States began to restrict trade with Japan. In 1940, it ceased exporting airplanes, airplane parts, aviation fuel and machine tools to Japan, and in 1941, it stopped the export of oil. This intensified the Japanese need for rubber from Malaya and oil from the Dutch East Indies [0]

[0] https://www.reference.com/history/did-japan-attack-united-st...

I kid though, it was a war situation for the US anyway. They stop supplying Japan, Japan goes to war. They keep supplying Japan, Japan gets stronger and secures more resources until it feels confident in going to war.

chrisseaton4y ago

> it was a war situation for the US anyway

Right.... so we needed a strong military, right? No point relying on 'love' alone?

1 more reply

hutzlibuOP4y ago

Oh, sure. Si vis pacem, para bellum.

But the thing is: for example switzerland can claim they are honestly doing this. The US not really. There it seems more "to prepare for war to go for war".

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

chrisseaton4y ago

No matter how much 'love' you give, someone somewhere will want to take more from you. And if you have nothing to defend yourself with they're going to walk all over you.

What 'love' do you think the US should have given to Japan to stop them attacking?

What do you do when you've given all your 'love' and have nothing left and they ask for more or they'll attack? You need a military and it needs to be good.

ativzzz4y ago

> What 'love' do you think the US should have given to Japan to stop them attacking?

Oil and military equipment.

[0] https://www.reference.com/history/did-japan-attack-united-st...

chrisseaton4y ago

> it was a war situation for the US anyway

Right.... so we needed a strong military, right? No point relying on 'love' alone?

1 more reply

hutzlibuOP4y ago

Oh, sure. Si vis pacem, para bellum.

But the thing is: for example switzerland can claim they are honestly doing this. The US not really. There it seems more "to prepare for war to go for war".

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse