According to Adi Shamir[1] 98% of bitcoins belonged to 2% of portfolios in 2012. So... The government is "bad" because you can actually express your opinion in monetary policy, you know who's who, etc. and BTC (or any other crypto) is good because you have absolutely no idea who the 2% is? I'm not following...

Regarding the gov and BTC. The government will tax BTC the same will tax any other asset, so in reality, the gov doesn't care. You can choose to hide profits from BTC and you'd choose to hide profits from any other financial activity. I don't really see the US Gov fighting bitcoin, if anything the gov tries to put BTC into perspective.

If you are anti-gov because "gov is bad (by default)" I get the feeling but has little to do with BTC.

[1]: http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/584.pdf

And why?

Because our current finance market is regulated and we don't need bitcoin to free it.

Its not technology which is putting all those restrictions and systems onto the finance market therefore a technology like btc doesn't solve anything.

Companies for example are not allowed to do trade with North Korea by law. So if everyone starts to use btc to do exactly that, guess who will step in and regulate it?

I'm always lost on why people think btc will fix any issues we currently have. There is a reason why people invest in Euros and Dollars ('hard' currencies) and gold.