It's ugly, it occasionally breaks your models, and it's capable of doing anything you could possibly want it to. It's like Gimp (before the new UI) vs. Photoshop.
There are lots of tutorials, but the quality is all over the place, and a lot of the wiki articles are out of date. The best way to learn FreeCAD (in my opinion) is to find something you want to accomplish (fix that broken part in the dishwasher) and experiment until you get the hang of it.
If you want to do simple CAD e.g. for 3D printing and you must use FOSS then I would recommend SolveSpace instead. It has some awkward flaws (most notably there's no bevel/chamfer feature) but aside from that it is much much better and easier to use than FreeCAD.
If you don't want to punish yourself by using FOSS then I would either way use Fusion360 and put up with their recently gimping of the free version, or simply pirate Solidworks. It's still by far the easiest CAD software to use, though the latest versions are getting kind of bloated.
FOSS CAD is not in a good shape yet.
Off topic, but until recently I would have said the same for EDA. Kicad may be powerful but it was also apparently designed by a UX sadist. Even if you are really familiar with other EDA tools it still makes approximately zero sense and has loads of weird "features" (like if you drag a component in the schematic it doesn't bring it's wires with it!) Eagle and gEDA are even worse.
Fortunately there's at least one decent FOSS EDA program now: Horizon EDA. There's also LibrePCB which I haven't tried, but Horizon is good and pretty easy to use (it has a rather confusing and over-complicated component/gate system but you can mostly ignore that).
Kicad is way better than it used to be.
> (like if you drag a component in the schematic it doesn't bring it's wires with it!)
This is usually different modes in a schematic editor, because often "bringing the wires" does more harm than good. The default is different in KiCad from most-- "g" to bring wires, drag to not.
FreeCAD is great and very capable (I used Fusion 360 before) if you spent more time with it and switch to glass add-on and other tweaks. Program defaults make it unappealing.
Solidworks has a Community Edition now, that's free for Hobbyists:
https://www.solidworks.com/support/community-download#no-bac...
That edition seems to have the stuff that most Hobbyists would be after. :)
Here's a tube, which we can think about like the difference of two cylinders.
Writing and refactoring into modules (functions) is very natural and allowed me to get more perspective about the relationships of my models
module Tube(height, width, thickness) {
difference() {
cylinder(h=height, r=width);
cylinder(h=height,r=width-thickness);
};
};So in the end I always came back to OpenSCAD. It doesn't do curved surfaces all that well, its rendering is sometimes really slow, but it just works. With a couple simple Bezier curve functions certain things can look really nice, thanks to its nice commandline parameters and plain text file format you can always just plug it together with bash scripts or other tools. A list of all its features fit on a single page, and you can do anything with those.
It's just a really great program and the only CAD software I don't find unnecessarily frustrating. It has a few quirks but those are really minor details.
I feel like it's not as far along as say KiCad or Blender as far as "competitive with commercial offerings" open source tooling goes, but development is very active and it seems to be improving at an impressive rate.
But then so is Autocad's
TBH, neither are real 3D modeling softwares.
In both packages, you have do all your thinking in 2D, which is ideal if you did learn to design parts back in the 20th century with paper and pen, and an absolute torture if you did with real 3D software in the modern computer era.
For example, building a real 3D curve, i.e. something that has actual 3D curvature and no simple plane projection is simply a nightmare.
I'm a PHB! When I'm not doing PHB things, I indulge my guilty pleasures.
OpenSCAD is pretty much tamed by me now. I'm not an expert by any means but I can design and print a mount for my Doorbird to toe it in towards the ringer. I use FreeCAD with my browser open to look up what to do. It is rather good and keeps on improving. I'm aware of Blender but it scares me. LibreCAD is available. I use SweetHome3D for home/office related stuff.
We have a decent pool of open source tools for CAD. FreeCAD is extremely capable already and keeps on getting better. I used to run it on Gentoo a few years back and simply getting it to compile was a pain. It is rapidly improving but do make sure you keep incremental backups for important work.
Have a look at this lot for some idea of what is on offer: https://wiki.freecadweb.org/Tutorials Those are quite old and there is a lot more on offer.
I personally prefer Fusion 360 (it feels sleeker and is way more usable with a touchpad), but it's definitely a viable choice.
MagicaVoxel is a much simpler tool that’s more like working on a sandcastle & can be 3D printed.
Blender is probably better for animation / games.
For home additions, Trimble SketchUp is more productive because there is a large library of building components pre-modeled (like doors or standard pieces of wood that can be purchased at Home Depot).
For PCB layout, there are other specialized EDA tools references in other comments.
It's feature set isn't great for accurate mechanical engineering where you can find the measurement for every bit nice and easy. It really is "Connect the Dots 3D". It is more of a "make a cool digital object" thing.
But for example, I can take an object, turn it to "goo", play forward 5 seconds of animation and 3D print a "melted" version of that object. I mean, I don't know why you would, but you can.
Blender enables artistic possibilities for objects in ways that FreeCAD doesn't.
But you can use both!
Drawing the selection rectangle from left to right selects all lines fully covered by the rectangle.
Drawing the selecton rectangle from right to left selects all lines partially or fully covered by the rectangle.
(Either this, or the other way round.)
Does FreeCAD or any other free CAD solution support this? I can't do without this. Which one of the free CAD solutions out there imitate Autocad 2005 the closest?
Now it's great, but if you're going to copy features like this, please make sure to document them so that people trying to learn how to use your tool without the requisite historical perspective don't get frustrated.
Eventually computing is going to get to the point where it's no longer possible to learn all of the historical baggage around why things are done a certain way. For a lot of people, we're already there.
As so many submissions around here demonstrate, though, UI design ain't what it used to be.
Interesting. I started with AutoCAD version 1.1. This is pre-PC days. It ran on an S-100 8086 system with an 8087 math coprocessor card, a specialized graphics card, a VT-100 terminal (the real thing, not a terminal emulator running as software one a computer), 640K of RAM disk and the CP/M operating system.
The right-to-left and left-to-right selection idioms have been part of my design "DNA" for decades. I can see how this could be confusing, yet, to be frank, I don't think it is that hard to discover.
That said, yes, absolutely positively I do agree with you in that complex tools have been doing a substandard job of communicating state, commands, options, features and commands to users. On the electronics design front I use Altium Designer. Altium have done a horrible job with the latest version (21.x.x). It is hard to list the bugs the program has, the UI/UX mess they have created, the lack of discoverability and, in general, the tangled rats-nest the software has become. Much like AutoCAD, I have been using Altium for a long time. It is hard to want to support a company through annual license renewals when they clearly don't seem to care about users.
For me, by far, the best user experiences have come from Solidworks and Fusion 360. I have far more experience with SW. The program has improved with time and the UI experience is great.
I wonder how many people (myself included) learned of this behavior from this post...
FreeCAD is far from it in terms of number of geometric tools, and especially 3D path stroking.
Freeform surfaces are a great pain in any CAD, but FreeCAD barely does even basics.
To catch up to SolidWorks, FreeCAD needs like tenfold increase in effort for the geometry kernel.
https://www.wired.com/insights/2014/12/understanding-the-inn...
That is, some people have different needs, and so dismissing FreeCAD because it doesn't yet fulfill your needs is a mistake.
Install PieMenu addon
Install Glass addon
Enable TreeView
Make icons larger so it's easier to tell what function they are for.
My must-have is the workspace selector one that makes them buttons instead of that drop-down.
FreeCAD Simulator - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25098981 - Nov 2020 (13 comments)
FreeCAD BIM development news - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24951311 - Oct 2020 (23 comments)
FreeCAD: A free and open source multiplatform 3D parametric modeler - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24513340 - Sept 2020 (268 comments)
A Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) workbench for FreeCAD - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23787391 - July 2020 (4 comments)
FreeCAD on Raspberry Pi 4 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22347385 - Feb 2020 (36 comments)
Parametric CAD modeling for open source scientific hardware: OpenSCAD / FreeCAD - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22270981 - Feb 2020 (1 comment)
FreeCAD BIM development news December 2018 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18800484 - Jan 2019 (22 comments)
FreeCAD 0.17 “Roland” released - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16790814 - April 2018 (58 comments)
FreeCAD Arch development news - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14480294 - June 2017 (44 comments)
FreeCAD 0.16 release notes - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11533435 - April 2016 (75 comments)