It was 'run' by the local university, but really was just a package deal they bought from another company.
I gave the university some feedback that they have all the resources at the university to do WAY better than these commercial bootcamps... but the folks involved bought the package deal and are invested in it.
It's sad, the university IMO could do better, if they tried.
Meanwhile the traditional unversity system does work, but is a huge time investment, and the bootcamp system works 'kinda' for some folks ... but fails most IMO.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Innovator%27s_Dilemma
[1] https://www.wired.com/insights/2014/12/understanding-the-inn...
The Facebook widget I wrote was better than being on Facebook and it still fills me with irritation to this day they shitcanned it :-)
[0]https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674089044
Not true for all startups, but increasingly common among the moonshot ones.
They did not break the traditional learning way, but they help a LOT of people, me included, to learn new things.
Could I learn them otherwise, from books and web pages? Sure, but MOOCs help. Did I already attend a university before, so I can guess what MOOC is good and which one is BS? Sure. Are they much less effective than traditional university? Yes. Of course.
But, they are not useless and I am glad they exist, even when they were a bit overhyped in the past.