If you mean "the stereotypes don't admit the functional, healthy obese person" i get it but not everything said about the risks of obesity is wrong.
Whats wrong, is objectification. The article fundamentally is about this, and toxic for profit health system consequences.
Hospitals have to build special operating theatre fitout, imaging systems, even wheelchairs to deal with larger size people. Some forms of surgery do incur higher risk. Diagnosis is harder. Are they insurmountable problems? No. Are they therefore not problems "really"? I don't know.
I do know I agree with a lot the article said. The bodies sense of homeostasis for weight appears to only have an upwards ratchet, and its harder for women (without diminishing how hard weight objectification is for men and kids)
eg an ultrasound technician fighting belly fat, trying to image something underlying, and the unavoidable issues around "if you had less this diagnostic would be simpler"
The woman with gall bladder issues got really short shrift in the article. She wasn't properly diagnosed.
Fructose, for example, appears to damage insulin sensitivity and liver function more than other sweeteners with the same number of calories.
but:
(https://foodinsight.org/what-is-fructose/) Fructose is also known as “fruit sugar” because it primarily occurs naturally in many fruits. It also occurs naturally in other plant foods such as honey, sugar beets, sugar cane and vegetables.
and the article specifically recommends eating more fruit and vegetables.
