Last time I booked a car at Hertz:
> Me: My email is hertz@capableweb.work
> Agent: Woah, you work here at Hertz? That's so cool
> Me: sure, can you remind me of the employee discount again?
So many email validations fail with a uncommon gTLD that I started switching everything to a .com domain instead. Sometimes I even get rejected when my email address contains the company name... "Sorry, your email seems invalid" is all I get, but changing one letter of the company name makes it pass the validation...
It took me a while to know that FQDNs can (and sometimest must?) start at root with a period, meaning every address you've ever typed could have finished with a period (news.ycombinator.com.) and I recall some newspaper (NYT? News Yorker?) failing to test for that when people want to bypass their paywall. And this is a valid email address apparently: #!$%&’*+-/=?^_`{}|~@example.com
RFCs/codified norms by tech people are just weird to normal people.
> this is a valid email address apparently: #!$%&’*+-/=?^_`{}|~@example.com
If so, that's actually the same as #!$%&’*@example.com (mail user 'foo+bar' is the same as 'foo'). Many webforms/DBs don't know that.
https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/gzr3cq/fyi_you_can_...
For a long time I could access Bloomberg for free because they failed open when you did this
I agree with you, just trying to understand how it's connected to what I wrote initially.
> Me: sure, can you remind me of the employee discount again?
Which suggests that you would/did ask for (an employee) discount code when renting from that company.
They haven't spammed that though, I don't think I've ever received any actual email to the "oracleblowsgoats" address. Probably keeps any sales droids from even bothering with me as well.
So, it is easier to blacklist it altogether.
Turns out she’s a nice girl, and she answered happily, “no, but that would be cool”. I smiled back while I died a little inside.
It’s always possible the person figures out this is not right before they get to the juicy bit. But I’ve been wrong before.
I'm not sure I would actually accept it if it went through, but I'm always curious to see if it works sometime.
Sadly, it is poorly adopted.
Nope. It confused the hell out of people.
> Me: sure, can you remind me of the employee discount again?
Sooo… did it work?
