You are right. The problem with the article is that the author is confusing two separate somewhat independent failures here:
1) Variable rate plans based on wholesale market resulting in customers getting massive electricity bills during the wholesale market price spike.
2) Due to lack of regulation, little to no spending on winterization of generating capacity, with the purpose of ensuring lower prices for consumers and higher margins for generators. Both of those objectives were accomplished by the system, but the tail risk/cost management was not, and therefore it was effectively socialized.
If the tail risk (at least the risks we can see) were addressed through regulation (the only way to do so), prices would rise for all plan types to pay for the winterization, irrespective of whether they are variable or flat rate.
That regulation and associated price rise has been up to the moment unpalatable to Texas voters.