Lloyd suggested `with` after the ten days, also the String.prototype.{anchor,bold,...}() methods, and I added them in the same spirit that I made == sloppy on request from others in the ex-Borland gang of four (Bill Turpin, I think). I should not have agreed to any of these. Lloyd can take credit for them. The String methods are the least offensive but not that useful, now-archaic.
Someone (I think jevering) wrote a dishonest Quora answer claiming Lloyd wrote an engine and I used or benefited from his code. That's false. Mitchell Baker, who was a Netscape lawyer at the time, came on Quora along with others from Netscape management to back up my testimony.
It's funny people want credit for JS when boosting their resumes (Lloyd did great with Looker and as far as I know doesn't need money), while I get blame still. As I should: again, I'm the idiot who agreed to these Borland-flavored requests: sloppy ==, `with`, HTML helper string methods. My blame and credit, mine! But Lloyd is welcome to a share of the blame if he wants. :-D