I think you’re completely missing the nuance in the words surrounding the authors mention of “Hanlon’s razor”.

Besides, look at Pavel Durovs flagkilled reply here. The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

The author is saying "maybe things that look A WHOLE LOT like malice are actually incompetence". It's pretty clear that he thinks it's a backdoor, even though he basically says "maybe in actually wrong, but I really don't think so".

Oh, please, this is not a math inequality where we compare with numbers. It is plain to any English speaker that what was written in the article and how you represented it differ significantly in the confidence that they communicate. As such, your continued insistence that there is no major difference between the two comes off as extremely poor faith.