Scientists Believe US Embassy and CIA Officers Hit with High-Power Microwaves (opens in new tab)

(scitechdaily.com)

37 pointspaulyg5y ago17 comments

17 comments

When I worked in radar, the people in the transmitter lab had little, hand held, microwave detectors as an additional layer of safety. If a wave guide hadn't been assembled correctly and was leaking microwaves, they would be warned before they were cooked. This was 1980. Such gadgets should be very cheap today.

Given the history, with the Great Seal Bug

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

I would expect plenty of monitoring; it is cheap and easy.

jaybrendansmith5y ago

We appear to be right back to the original explanation, an exposure to high-energy microwaves. I'd be curious to know if this is clearly an attack, or if this 'Frey effect' could happen accidentally because of nearby microwave transmission or similar?

gabrielblack5y ago

What about misused or defective radio equipment ? I guess that they have powerful microwave sat equipment, in there. This is a more reasonable explanation then mysterious "death ray" that, anyway, should be detectable and traceable with the right equipment, in case someone want to prove its existence. Moreover, what's the logic in creating a gratuitous diplomatic incident and possibly cause reprisals against the responsible ? IMHO , this story is the perfect click bait so nobody want to consider more logic and simple explanations.

lolc5y ago

What I don't get about this explanation is that I'd expect high-profile embassies to be at least monitored for radio activity or even shielded against it.

But maybe I'm just expecting too much vigilance here.

beerandt5y ago

The couple of stories I read in detail happened at/near employee houses, not at the embassy.

lolc5y ago

Ah, that explains it. Obviously it's hard to protect against this outside.

amscanne5y ago

IIUC, the microwave bursts are extremely directional, so you can’t really monitor for this effectively. Similarly, it’s bit unrealistic to cover the entire embassy in thick steel (and have no windows).

lolc5y ago

Such an attack cannot be hidden from detectors in the vincinity. There is far too much energy in the air for an antenna not to pick up on diffused and reflected emissions.

On the other hand a fine, grounded mesh will protect just fine against such attacks. Even in windows. Look up IEMI shielding.

Now taking these two together I think that it is possible that the embassy had both shielding and detectors. Because the attacks may have happened outside the shielding, and the detectors were inside to detect bugs.

1 more reply

netsharc5y ago

1. The article is a copy of the original: https://theconversation.com/scientists-suggest-us-embassies-... . I wonder if scitechdaily is just a content farm or if they had a license to copy that content.

2. This Vanity Fair article believes it's mass hysteria: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/01/the-real-story-behin...

williamtwild5y ago

Isn't vanity fair a fashion magazine?

jfengel5y ago

It's a culture magazine. It started life as a fashion magazine and includes a fair bit of fashion in its content, but it has always been broader than that. It looks more like The New Yorker than Vogue or Cosmo. Or perhaps a cross between The New Yorker and GQ.

mc325y ago

Yes but they’ve had people like Hitchens as contributors.

redsummer5y ago

I’ve heard the Great Seal Bug described as being activated by microwaves, and wonder if all these embassies and offices were riddled with similar bugs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

schappim5y ago

It is plausible, but the Great Seal (aka “the Thing”) only operated at 800Mhz. The microwave range is from 1 gigahertz (GHz), up to about 300 gigahertz.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

17 comments

alan-crowe5y ago

Given the history, with the Great Seal Bug

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

I would expect plenty of monitoring; it is cheap and easy.

jaybrendansmith5y ago

gabrielblack5y ago

lolc5y ago

What I don't get about this explanation is that I'd expect high-profile embassies to be at least monitored for radio activity or even shielded against it.

But maybe I'm just expecting too much vigilance here.

beerandt5y ago

The couple of stories I read in detail happened at/near employee houses, not at the embassy.

lolc5y ago

Ah, that explains it. Obviously it's hard to protect against this outside.

amscanne5y ago

lolc5y ago

Such an attack cannot be hidden from detectors in the vincinity. There is far too much energy in the air for an antenna not to pick up on diffused and reflected emissions.

On the other hand a fine, grounded mesh will protect just fine against such attacks. Even in windows. Look up IEMI shielding.

1 more reply

netsharc5y ago

2. This Vanity Fair article believes it's mass hysteria: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/01/the-real-story-behin...

williamtwild5y ago

Isn't vanity fair a fashion magazine?

jfengel5y ago

mc325y ago

Yes but they’ve had people like Hitchens as contributors.

redsummer5y ago

I’ve heard the Great Seal Bug described as being activated by microwaves, and wonder if all these embassies and offices were riddled with similar bugs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

schappim5y ago

It is plausible, but the Great Seal (aka “the Thing”) only operated at 800Mhz. The microwave range is from 1 gigahertz (GHz), up to about 300 gigahertz.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse