undefined | Better HN

0 pointstptacek5y ago0 comments

Your theory of the case here being that this company has managed to find a set of contracts that establishes 4/1 vesting and enabled a seed funder to invest $100k, but somehow didn't designate any officers of the company or any authority to terminate members of the company.

It could happen! They might reasonably spend $400-$500 figuring that out.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

xwdv5y ago· 2 in thread

Let them do it then, so the blood can be on their hands. Otherwise the story is "tech co-founder walked away because he couldn't keep up".

tptacekOP5y ago

The funny thing about this is that it isn't even good advice in the chest-puffing status-seeking model in which its proposed, because a big controversy with a former founder might mostly just makes you someone reasonable people might not want to work with.

ghaff5y ago

If there's a pattern it's one thing. But for a single event when it's hard for an outsider to figure out who was in the right and who was in the wrong, it's probably easier just to avoid both of them.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse