undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmlthoughts20185y ago0 comments

Several of the cited passages you link are factually wrong. For example, she definitively resigned and was not fired. Saying she was “fired” instantly reveals partisanship and prejudice to de facto define Google to be in the wrong and the resigned researcher to be in the right completely divorced of the facts.

0 comments

itsdrewmiller5y ago

This is misinformation presented very confidently. Unless you give a date for your resignation and the company honors that date, it is a termination. She alluded to one in the future but didn't even give a specific one, as I understand it.

prepend5y ago

> Unless you give a date for your resignation and the company honors that date, it is a termination

I’m not sure there’s such a fine line. Unless this is defined someone where in Google, I don’t think it’s accurate. I can resign in many ways and then there’s formalities.

itsdrewmiller5y ago

It is: https://cuiab.ca.gov/board/precedentdecisions/docs/pb39.pdf

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsmlthoughts20185y ago0 comments

0 comments

itsdrewmiller5y ago

prepend5y ago

> Unless you give a date for your resignation and the company honors that date, it is a termination

I’m not sure there’s such a fine line. Unless this is defined someone where in Google, I don’t think it’s accurate. I can resign in many ways and then there’s formalities.

itsdrewmiller5y ago

It is: https://cuiab.ca.gov/board/precedentdecisions/docs/pb39.pdf

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse