So here you are on HN, where most people love complaining about crypto since 2009 -- but they still have a dayjob they sure love to bitch about (even in FANGs!), while those of us who worked on crypto without any specific feelings are early retirees.
> I like this guy.
Me too, but I try to leave aside opinions and focus on interesting content.
Proudly grouping yourself with Peter Popoff and his "debt cancelling miracle spring water", with the justification "I made money so it's not a scam". With your friends Uri Geller, Charles Ponzi, Elizabeth Holmes, Kenneth Copeland, and crew.
> Me too, but I try to leave aside opinions
Sorry, was your first paragraph not gloating about your superiority, and looking down on and mocking people who still have to work for a living for not having your dispassionate visionary insight? Because it sure felt like a big dollop of opinion.
Personally, I did not run a company. I can just say I got people what they asked for, without false pretense, while being looked down upon by the likes of you.
> looking down on and mocking people who still have to work for a living
Guess what, actions come with consequences. You created your HN account in 2008. You most certainly knew about crypto in 2009. But you decided not to act - again, and again, and again for 12 years. While we both had to work for a living, I was selling my services for various things like sysadmin of mining rigs, and learning finance on the side to get into the industry.
Maybe you have a part of the blame?
> for not having your dispassionate visionary insight
It's never too late to get in the industry if you really want to, we're still in the early days - like the net in 1995.
However, you may have to change your bad attitude. You do not need passion, but you must at least drop the hatred if you want to work in crypto.
Last year the BBC ran a news article claiming:
> "Currently, the tool estimates that Bitcoin is using around seven gigawatts of electricity, equal to 0.21% of the world's supply. That is as much power as would be generated by seven Dungeness nuclear power plants at once. Over the course of a year, this equates to roughly the same power consumption as Switzerland."
Dungeness nuclear power plant cost £685 million by the time it was finished and opened in 1983, that's roughly £1.6Bn today. BitCoin (mining) collectively uses as much power as Switzerland, as much as £15Bn of UK nuclear power stations.
Do you honestly think it's added that much value to the world?
If so, what, where?
> "It's never too late to get in the industry if you really want to, we're still in the early days - like the net in 1995."
What's the "AOL of BitCoin" - the "way-in" for a hundred million Americans? What's the "ICQ of BitCoin", the thing that let me talk to my friends without having to call them one by one? What are the "webrings" of crypto, the Drewamweavers or FrontPages, getting the interest of normal people to build or create things? What's the email of crypto, delayed messaging which stores and buffers while offline? What's the equivalent of web developers selling small businesses on the benefits of owning a website to reach a national or international audience with much less marketing and advertising cost? What's the equivalent of Stripe or PayPal or Visa or Mastercard? What's the Amazon of crypto that started in 1996 or so? What's the equivalent of universities having large internet connections and server farms and setting up Grid computing for the research benefits? Where are the things you couldn't do at all before now?
One difference of the net in 1995 is that I wanted more access to the net in 1995 and couldn't have it for age reasons, tech reasons, money reasons. Where's the pent-up demand of people who want crypto and can't have it? Everyone who wants it can have it immediately, and could have had it years ago.
What about it is anything like the net of 1995? (Except your intent to make me dream big about the future growth and associated riches).
If you're a company and you accept bitcoin, it makes life harder for you, for approximately no customers, and the payment you get might lose half its value by next month or be stolen in ways you don't understand with no oversight or regulation and law enforcement with little experience of what to do next. If you're a normal person, it's a less convenient way to pay for things. Why should you give a damn? Smart Contracts better be really good to make up the rest.
The easy counter is "no wireless, less space than a Nomad, lame" and I must be blind to its benefits. The easy counter-counter is Sturgeons Law, most things look like crud because most things are crud.
What else did you know about in 2008, not get involved in, which turned out to be crud?
I'm sure all the Enron investors said something similar before they went bust