undefined | Better HN

0 pointsramraj075y ago0 comments

That sounds _very_ wrong, what type of throughput are we talking about here?

0 comments

3 comments · 2 top-level

PetahNZ5y ago· 1 in thread

Up to hundreds of images per second.

Okay that makes sense, when we have very low throughput it looks like consistency wasn't an issue but at that rate (especially if it occurs in bursts) I can see how the prior S3 implementation could fail to scale fast enough

riking5y ago

The story wasn't wrong, until today. That's why people are celebrating.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse