The Four Legs of Job Satisfaction (opens in new tab)

I think the social scene also counts.

I'm contemplating leaving my current job soon too. The author's list is actually really relevant to how I'm feeling right now.

I want to work with a smaller team, preferably at a startup. Anyone need a high-level frontend engineer? Please, contact me.

There are all kinds of things that contribute to "job satisfaction". But at the end of the day, none of these really means anything unless you're willing to make changes.

What I am saying is that recognizing a bad situation is easy, you can sum it up in "4 legs" or however many bullet points you want. Does anyone really need to give you rules to determine if a job sucks? No, you just "know" it.

The hard (and interesting) thing is taking action about it. That could mean solving the problems in your current position, finding a way to deal with problem people or just leaving.

Tried to access this site from work and it's blocked by the corporate firewall. When I saw it at home last night, there didn't seem to be anything inappropriate about the site. Maybe I'm missing something?

I guess that means my current job ranks low according to the criteria in this article.

hmmm if all the legs are too short the table is still stable?

This is just my personal philosophy. I think it all comes down to whether you feel recognition and respect for your work.

This recognition comes from yourself, your direct peers, your superiors, your subordinates, your customers, your friends, and your family. If any one group thinks lowly of what you do it has a strong effect. If all of them think that way it would be very distressing.

The only way anything matters is as it relates to recognition from any of those groups. Your own background and the people around you have a tremendous effect what works and what doesn't.

For example, a financial planner who made $5 million last year might be thrown into depression if they were reduced to doing taxes for middle-class clients for $50,000 per year. But a junior college graduate from a poor background might be filled with importance to have that opportunity. Likewise being praised by a Nobel laureate would probably be much different than being praised by your barber who thinks your app is cool.

So, figure out what would make you respect yourself. Work for someone who respects you and has customers that respect what they do. Have peers that respect you. And hire subordinates that respect you. Surround yourself with people whose respect is meaningful and earn it. Respect can come in the form of money, but any one form of respect can get negated if the others are lacking. It sounds egocentric to type it out, but I think that's what we really want at the end of the day.

Theory X and Theory Y does an analysis of employee motivation http://www.netmba.com/mgmt/ob/motivation/mcgregor/

I like this analogy. I would say that culture is actually part of "do you like who you're working with," though. "I don't like the culture" is a way of saying "I don't like management" or "I don't like my peers."

If your immediate peers are great, but the organization doesn't support your getting training, makes you dress up, makes you keep timesheets, requires TPS reports and long meetings, etc, those decisions are being made by people. And they are being annoying (even if they're otherwise nice).

How about growth? Even if a job seems perfect today if there is no path for you to grow the job may not seem perfect tomorrow. A hacker doesn't need to move to management to grow but if the job doesn't allow you to try new technologies, methodologies and change with time you will grow to loathe the position.

This is way too much analysis for a simple conclusion: some jobs are satisfying, and some are not, and various factors are important in evaluating whether one's job is great, acceptable, or unacceptable.

The important thing to take out of the job satisfaction discussion is that if you enjoy doing the work (and that includes the social aspects, such as communicating with people you rely on and those who rely on you) and you are learning, you are probably doing fine. A four-legged coffee table, or eight-legged spider, metaphor isn't really necessary.

Stability, in my opinion, is overrated. The risk of losing one's career is rarely worth taking, but job volatility is, as long as it's fairly compensated, fine. I'd much rather have the job-vol of startups or finance than the long-term risk of career ruin involved in late-stage academia.