Yes this! You have 3 doping levels from cheapest to really expansive:
3: Silver (the doping that is known and detectable)
2: Gold (known and probably detectable but often combined with additional substance to "wash it out" faster or hide it behind other stuff like "legal" painkillers etc)
1: Platinum (doping that is not detectable in the next 5 years "seal of proof by laboratories?")
--------
3: Is for your little Darling or Bodybuilders ;)
2: For your National-cup
1: For Olympics, World-cups etc..(everything where lots of money is behind)
There is a lot of paranoia in the running community (for example) that even local municipal marathons are being won by amateurs doping (not to mention some people running with those Nike “Vaporfly” shoes with the carbon fiber plate in them.) I have my doubts about how effective it is at the amateur level. I suspect it’s like amateurs buying expensive golf clubs and golf balls hoping it will make them better when really they just need more practice and are skill limited rather than gear limited.
With that said I think a lot of the pedantics of "but IS doping really happening in international sports" going on in this thread could be emphatically answered with "uh, yes" by simply watching _Icarus_.
MONEY BEHIND...that's something else. And the Athletes don't pay for the Stuff, AND it's not in every sport and not every sport profits from doping.
My friend was in the finals in Beijing and in London, top-6. In London half a second from a medal. Yes doping would help immensely but those guys have too much honor to do this. No, there is no money behind. He gets sponsoring in form of a boat which is sponsored by the manufacturer. The rest of his life's expenses, all travels, housing, shipping of his equipment, bring wife and kids along sometimes, mortgage on their house, all that needs to be paid for. And it was a struggle to finance all this. Friends help, family helps, and a few local companies in his hometown chip in. He is a construction engineer and his net worth is less than half mine as a mid-30 programmer.
So yes, everybody keep downvoting me and ignore that not every "elite athlete" is some overpaid basketball or soccer pro making 8-figures a year and evading taxes.
Unless an athlete shows up that does manage to bring in serious amounts of money. In that case the lid goes on for a few years.
EDIT:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6327574/
>In football players, doping has recently become an important matter
>>Androgen abuse has not only a direct effect on myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis, but can also result in myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, hypertension and dyslipidemia
>>>Herbal supplements, anti-histamines and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/aug/08/more-young-f...
But no probable connection to Doping...when the guardian sleeps...
How much money is behind those sports? Hint...NOT much. We Talk about Cycling, Athletics, Football and so on..
>I know for a fact that 3 isn't even used on national-cup event in France
No you don't.
BTW: I knew for a Fact that Lance Armstrong was the biggest Cycle Pro ever born and he would never need doping because he was just in another league then anyone else.
EDIT: Would you look at that:
http://sportscene.tv/paddlesports/2016/07/doping-problem-in-...
https://www.firstpost.com/sports/rio-2016-doping-scandal-hit...
But that's the Romanian Team...would never happen in France right?
> How much money is behind those sports? Hint...NOT much. We Talk about Cycling, Athletics, Football and so on..
No, the parent talked about:
> basically every elite athlete is doping.
That's just not true. Unless you have a totally twisted understanding of what an athlete is.