Don't people from facebook see this'd increase the already existing polarization and information bubbles?
Facebook isn't optimizing for the preservation of democratic norms or decrease of polarization; they're optimizing for eyeballs, time, and attention (which obviously translates to money).
To answer your question, they may not see it because they don't care, and if they do see it, they still don't care as that's not their KPI.
(Disclaimer: I'm not talking about specific employees but rather the company as an organization)
I do think it's funny that "news" has become hard synonymous with "politics" despite the fact that columns like the arts, lifestyle, product reviews, food, local events, human interest, short fiction, non-political opinions, and sports are just as much news and are, arguably, the good bits.
As much as my knee jerk reaction is against this, I also am asking myself: how's it really different from my own behavior? (and should I re-evaluate my own behavior).
Edit: Spelling/grammar.
Really curious as to why.
Yes non web devs, or web devs in a rush because of a poorly managed project + deadline I reckon.
Outside agency makes a lot of sense to me.
When you say get out of tech, you wouldn't happen to mean on a ranch would you? Been seeing more and more references to tech folk wanting to escape to such places ha!
Until the publishers came, dragged him to court on claims of copyright infringement (for doing deep links into the articles). That was a time, when clicking on a teaser brought you to a category page where you had to click the teaser again to get to the intended article. Why? To increase ad impressions. Sometimes you had to click three or four levels deep.
So they feared the lost ad impressions. They pulled the big guns on a high school kid creating a service. He agreed to delist them and the service was dead in the water. Because nearly every publisher wanted his sites to be delisted.
One or one and a half years later Google entered the German internet with Google News and the publishers sued again - this time it came to a trial and Google won. But 20 years later the publishers still try to lobby for laws against aggregators, against quoting from "their" news.
Thanks for this trip down memory lane into the late 90ies. Now I feel old. ;-)
Introducing the "Democracy Breaker 2.0"
Honestly, news is mostly terrible experience right now, and the prospects of facebook delivering news is about as exciting as Mafia Wars invites and Farmeville status posts from back in the day.
Unfortunately I don't completely trust Facebook to be impartial the news they report.
They could very easily skew a narrative on a particular issue by placing news articles they agree with at the top, and not displaying articles that they don't agree with.
That said, it's their business and they can do with it what they want, and it's still our decision if we want to use that feature.
How would this News app stand against existing market players? I don't see the differentiation factor TBH
The only way I use Facebook is within a container in Firefox. I'll never install a Facebook developed application onto a phone ever again.
If what you're doing is making a competitor to google news, it should just be a webpage.