undefined | Better HN

0 pointsnomel5y ago0 comments

From the original thread [1], which people should probably read:

> The fact it had no signal at the time of the tamper safeguard being triggered meant that remote recovery wasn't an option, even when we moved it into the open. Idk, an extra layer of theft protection I suppose.

1. https://www.reddit.com/r/Justrolledintotheshop/comments/j9qn...

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

outworlder5y ago· 1 in thread

This makes total sense, honestly. Jamming a signal would be indeed best done at the time of the (attempted) intrusion.

nomelOP5y ago

Yeah, I imagine their security team would have a very unique perspective on this. I imagine it was implemented this way as a response to thefts they saw in the past/envisioned.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse