undefined | Better HN

0 pointsIncRnd5y ago0 comments

Schwartz's beliefs and statements don't apply. Schwartz didn't write the controlling law.

0 comments

4 comments · 1 top-level

syshum5y ago· 3 in thread

Schwartz's was the CEO of the company that held the "copyright" should one exist at the time of the alleged "infringement"

Thus Schwartz's beliefs are and should be relevant

IncRndOP5y ago

But, Oracle isn't Schwartz. Swartz isn't suing.

Under what legal basis?

Estoppel was mentioned elsethread.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse