IMO David Hahn's reactor is still more impressive. Kids these days can't even make a DIY superfund site properly...
https://harpers.org/archive/1998/11/the-radioactive-boy-scou...
Up until around 2010, you'd be shouted down as a troll for taking down this kid's achievements.
The focus should be on all of the effort that the kid put forth which many other equally privileged or lucky kids would have squandered.
[0] This is something Daniel Markovits talks about: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/09/meritoc...
So I would say, yes it is a flaw of meritocracy, but meritocracy is not flawed.
Kid got a full scholarship to Duke University. And I’ve seen this in other Asian immigrants as well, a cab driver in NYC whose daughter was at Cornell Medical School.
I'm not sure what actions you expect society to make to address this.
Should smart people deliberately not be good parents so that social justice can prevail in a world full of not-so-smart people?
Should not-so-smart people just not have children so society can be smarter as a whole?
Interesting how the rich were blamed for being fat cats and not are blamed for overworking so much they win the race.
It seems some people are genuinely surprised there's more to money and status than just having the newest phone.
You mean funded. That Pfeiffer Turbopump is several hundred bucks used.
When I was 13 years old, I would have killed someone to own just that analog scope.
I resorted to building one off an used ATX computer power supply, but voltages fluctuated a lot and also it was pretty high and non-regulable in current output. That was a recipe for troubles. Indeed, when one of the first boards I was learning on caught fire (mis-configured potentiometer + non-limited current dwaw) I didn't feel safe anymore to continue and basically stopped doing that kind of stuff.
So yeah, extremely impressive achievement for a 13 years old student, not downplaying his achievement, but it's wrong to understate the role that his parents and their funding had.
While the kid building his reactor is almost certainly intelligent and driven, he was also lucky enough to be born into a family in the upper 1% income bracket, because most people would have neither the space nor the funds to set up such a laboratory.
It's kind of the same with child prodigy musicians. Unless the parents have a piano at home, they'll most likely not notice their kids talent early enough. And most middle-income families these days don't own a house and won't have a piano around for decorative purposes.
BTW, that harpers link is an amazing story :)
“I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.”
1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vvhy141WU14&ab_channel=Afrin... (Fox affiliate if that bothers you)
Plenty of kids with pianos and parents musicians grow up not being child prodigies. But, pretty much no child prodigies grew up in environment where people don't listen music much, without access to piano, teacher (official or unofficial) and so on.
Unless the parents lie and literally manufactured it all, both components needs to be present. For most 13-15 years old, just focusing on one big project and keep interest is quite unusual. So is willingness to build one thing for so long.
What a crock of shit. I understand the whole worship of individualism, but this is just taking it absurdly far. Look at Schwarzenegger, and how frequently he keeps saying that he only got to where he is because of help from other people - nothing that you do is ever only your own accomplishment. And then on the other side you have a 13 year old kid who says he was the only one involved in design and production(!!!) of this device - give me a break. He might be super bright, but somehow this kind of article grinds my gears like nothing else.
You are missing his age. He is not a grown up who could graps the whole complexity of the task. He can see what he have done, but he is unable to grasp what others did to make his achievement possible. Such an inability would be worrying for me, if he was older -- 20 years old, or even 16-18 years old. But for 13 yo kid it is absolutely normal. Cognitive limitations he shows are only to be expected. There is no reason to grumble about society degrading to a hell.
We should be bigger than this.
One wonders how many kids swallowed up by poor, resource-starved neighborhoods would have been able to achieve similar feats given more access and resources. Kids generally have nothing but time -- so yeah, if you finance their projects and give them your support and an environment conducive to focusing on hacking on fusion reactors, or becoming chess or math or music prodigies, or whatever, they'll tend to do that. And likewise if you give them an environment conducive to trauma, financial stress, and poverty, well, that's what they'll tend towards.
There are exceptions in both cases -- I'm sure many of us can think of people who came from wealth and ultimately didn't amount to much, and some of the most brilliant and accomplished people I know came from abject poverty. My point is that wealth and resources makes stuff easier -- or even possible in the first place.
[1]
> Building the nuclear fusion reactor was no game for Jackson. He converted an old playroom in his Memphis home into a functioning lab. With the financial support of his parents – he spent between $8,000 and $10,000 over the course of a year collecting the parts he needed to build his nuclear fusion reactor – that was apparently the easy part.
[2]
> Jackson’s father, Chris Oswalt, had no real understanding of what his son was working on. To make sure Jackson was safe he had experts speak to him about the dangers involved with working on a potentially deadly fusion reactor, like being exposed to high levels of radiation or being electrocuted by the 50,000 volts of electricity he uses to warm the fusion reactor’s plasma core.
https://www.foxnews.com/science/teen-builds-working-nuclear-...
I live in Austria. In the 70, 80ies it is save to say it was a socialist country. Universities were free, school education was free. There were no private universities and practically no private schools. The idea was that everyone should have equal possibilities for a start.
It was a time of great social cohesion and peace. Maybe we went to far with Theatherism and privatizations.
It's quite the Festival of Debunking a 12 Year Old Kid going here on Hacker News, and it's embarrassingly transparent. Yes, you're all very smart too.
Children are capable of absolutely amazing things when they are told "yes" and given respect and minimum guidance. Of course my example is not as mind-blowing as this, but my son built his own forge and has made beautiful knives and swords from found metal. Tons of research and sweat and persistence on his part, and not ours. And if we were interviewed about it, the soundbites would come out about the same: "Yup, he did it, we were a bit worried, but he was managing the risks and knew and followed the necessary rules, so ultimately we trusted him."
Like, that's just few questions that come to my mind in like 2 seconds, I'm sure a competent interviewer could think of more.
I once wore a baseball hat for a month, day in, day out, sleep, etc. However first, I ripped out the liner, and placed tinfoil inside, replacing the liner afterwards.
I wanted to empirically test -- to see, would I behave differently? Think differently? So I also kept a journal.
Problem was, did I EVER SWEAT! And this was in the winter too.
The solution? A hat which is not directly in contact with the head! And has space under it to breath. Like this hard-hat!
Clearly, this kid knows the truth, knows the forces aligned against us all, and this hardhat, in this pic, is his message to us all.
Beware. Beware of them, of those, placing thoughts in our minds!
Obviously a staged photo, there is even a Newton's cradle, like in Hollywood movies.
There are a few pictures of him working, he is just wearing normal clothes, and no hard hat.
Impressive build by the kid!
The kind of nuclear fusion that governments spend billions of dollars of research on though is the kind where you actually get some net energy out of the reaction.
-- Within his home, Jackson’s lab is quite extensive and he describes it as having too many parts to even write down! --
Looks precisely like the model I bought from Amazon, to pull a vacuum for my self-install of my heat pump at home! These sorts of heat pumps come pre-charged with coolant, so after you connect the copper piping between the head (indoor) unit and the external compressor, you then need to pull a vacuum, validate the system is stable, then finally let the coolant into the entire system.
To me, this only highlights how some things are easily done with low cost, off the shelf parts.
https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B01N6IOBWF/
When I was a kid, there was no way to easily, or effectively find such things anywhere my small rural town. Nor was there any easy way to even find magazines, which might have ads for companies selling such things!
What a world we live in. Awesome.
Getting the plutonium is the hard part though. And I'm probably trivializing it / missing some steps.
I'm probably on a List now.
A playroom is a room in a house where children are normally let loose to play and make a mess.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24706414
> What a crock of shit. I understand the whole worship of individualism, but this is just taking it absurdly far. Look at Schwarzenegger, and how frequently he keeps saying that he only got to where he is because of help from other people - nothing that you do is ever only your own accomplishment. And then on the other side you have a 13 year old kid who says he was the only one involved in design and production(!!!) of this device - give me a break. He might be super bright, but somehow this kind of article grinds my gears like nothing else.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24706132
> Whenever I see a young success story like this, I get even more curious about the parents, which should be a whole nother article imho.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24705954
> Youngest? Maybe, but the slickness of those pictures tells me that the real achievement comes from the parents who...nurtured...his inclinations. IMO David Hahn's reactor is still more impressive. Kids these days can't even make a DIY superfund site properly...
1. hacker (definition): Someone who is brilliantly persistent in solving technical problems, whether these involve golfing, fighting orcs, or programming. Hacker is a neutral term, morally speaking.
Look at him, dressed like a dandy, with his accomplishments framed and a much too clean workspace and Hollywood scientist accessories.
That's not how I portrait a hacker, especially not a kid hacker. I want to see him on a workbench with tools all over the place, I want to know how he solved the hundred of problems that arose. I want to see him yelled at by his parents because he didn't follow safety rules. Everything looks too clean to be true. I don't mean that kid is a fraud, but the article doesn't really show his "hacker" side, besides a few pictures taken when he was younger.
Also, a damn neat home project!