undefined | Better HN

0 pointsshmerl5y ago0 comments

Because in my opinion Windows is terrible :) For many reasons.

Linux users don't use Nvidia if they are interested in the modern desktop use case. That's a well known factor. If someone migrates to Linux using Nvidia, chances are high they'll change it to AMD on the next GPU upgrade.

0 comments

filmgirlcw5y ago

> Linux users don't use Nvidia if they are interested in the modern desktop use case.

Which rules out anyone who wants to game or do CUDA stuff.

Everyone is welcome to their own opinions and preferences, but if you ask me, if the response to a request to use the most powerful/performant graphics cards is to switch to AMD (and AMD has some good cards but Nvidia’s are better and OpenCL can’t compete with CUDA when it comes to any machine learning work), well, that’s part of why Linux’s modern desktop adoption is still so small.

If the only option is to use an AMD GPU, you might as well just get a Mac and use actual UNIX.

And honestly, to each their own! But you asked why anyone would use WSL2 and you’ve got a good answer: they want to be able to take advantage of their chosen hardware and access the various Linux tools.

shmerlOP5y ago

I didn't see an answer that explains how WSL is better than Linux proper, at least not in case when you don't care about Windows itself.

AMD is fine for gaming, I'm using 5700XT on Linux for playing games. And AMD will match Nvidia higher end cards next month. So I don't see any reason to use Nvidia for that.

WSL offers nothing for gaming or similar use cases that regular Linux can't. If you need to use CUDA with Nvidia hardware, you can do it on Linux proper just fine, you don't need WSL for it - Nvidia provide support.

filmgirlcw5y ago

Yes, I’m aware that Nvidia supports Linux for CUDA. Linux is a very popular headless environment for this reason.

I was responding to your response that Nvidia drivers for HiDPi and other display issues are subpar with “well, everyone who is serious about using Linux on the desktop uses AMD.”

First, that’s not true (as evidenced by the many people who do CUDA workloads in Linux). Second, my overarching point is that it’s strikes me as being really dismissive to say “well just don’t use the hardware you like/want/need if you want a good Linux on the desktop experience.”

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

filmgirlcw5y ago

> Linux users don't use Nvidia if they are interested in the modern desktop use case.

Which rules out anyone who wants to game or do CUDA stuff.

If the only option is to use an AMD GPU, you might as well just get a Mac and use actual UNIX.

shmerlOP5y ago

I didn't see an answer that explains how WSL is better than Linux proper, at least not in case when you don't care about Windows itself.

AMD is fine for gaming, I'm using 5700XT on Linux for playing games. And AMD will match Nvidia higher end cards next month. So I don't see any reason to use Nvidia for that.

filmgirlcw5y ago

Yes, I’m aware that Nvidia supports Linux for CUDA. Linux is a very popular headless environment for this reason.

I was responding to your response that Nvidia drivers for HiDPi and other display issues are subpar with “well, everyone who is serious about using Linux on the desktop uses AMD.”

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse