For a while I fancied myself as an amateur photographer. First on film, and then digital.
After 1000s of shots, and tons of money on kit and film etc. plus hours of learning techniques, I realised that I would never be able to take photos that were worth showing anyone.
My photos look amateur. Jack Sharp's do not.
At the end of the day, I firmly believe you either have a photographic eye, or you don't.
https://www.nga.gov/features/robert-frank/the-americans-1955...
I sought out this feeling in a digital camera for over a decade. After trying a bunch of Fujis I finally broke down and got an M10. It feels just like my old film Leicas until it runs out of battery.
I love the Fujifilm X100 line of cameras.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujifilm_X100#Fujifilm_X100V
Digital, but old school glass viewfinder, classic film type physical, controls, but also the convenience of some gorgeous film emulation if you want it.
I feel like I can operate old school like film (well obviously there isn't a darkroom here) with limited to no digital interaction while I'm photographing, and jump into the digital world when I want that convenience.
So it's not about skill. But whether you do it only for fun, or for a living.
"At the end of the day, I firmly believe you either have a photographic eye, or you don't."
Perhaps, but virtually learning anything in the world involves 2 things: hard work & commitment.
My canton wouldn't follow for about another decade, but the flip side of slow adoption is that implementation hasn't been subject to foot-dragging[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23885838
US-based HN'ers may wish to compare also Article 8 of our constitution: https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/19995395/...
with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Rights_Amendment#/media/...
[1] found the original soundtrack to that overdub: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc6NehFdQ5g (still haven't found a Trump/Azar duet, however)
I am in my early twenties and from Switzerland. My father was born four years after this picture was taken, can't wrap my head around the fact that my country was so incredibly sexist back then. The arguments are laughably bad.
I wondered which parties voted against it, as expected the only one was SVP(BGB back then). Who would have thought...
EDIT: The last canton to allow woman to vote was Appenzell Innerrhoden in 1990.
I am an American. I grew up in a highly educated household that valued education, being kind to each other and rejecting nationalism. We don't hold up our flag and somehow feel uncomfortable with patriotism. Our family constantly argues about the US military and its might, its wrong doings and its good deeds.
With that said, I've interacted with several Swiss friends and found a repeating pattern of opinions (which we laugh off as jokes) - of how proud Americans are about their country. For me and my social circle in a mid-large city in US, it is completely the opposite. Even during college, none of my fellow friends had any shred of pride in being an American (I studied Engineering). It was mostly looking up to Switzerland (and EU, esp. Scandanavia) as utopian paradise.
Could you please help provide some light on the following questions that I would feel very uncomfortable asking otherwise:
- Do Swiss people also feel shame of being patriotic?
- As an outsider, we see Swiss flags advertised on pretty much every Swiss company, product and service. But, I realize that it may be a mirage and not the actual on-the-grounds situation in Switzerland. Do you see the Swiss pride internally as well or it is just a commercial brandname/marketing ploy since Swiss brand is so strong.
- What, if any, are the views about anti-patriotism that is exemplified by Germans. Hardly see German flags and patriotism there seems to be muted if not outright rejected. Is there any sort of friction?
In the biography of a 1st world politician (national level during the 1970s), he recollects that he lost his first race, in the 1960s. Only to win it a day or two later, because someone noticed that a bunch of people who had voted for his opponent not only did so in alphabetical order, but were also dead.
So he did in fact proceed to the legislature, only to find the first topic of debate for that session was about how long someone had to be dead before they couldn't vote anymore.
I hope that in 2020 the metabolically challenged no longer vote, at least not in alphabetical order.
Assuming the Securitas of the time didn't dress like that, this'd be more up to date: https://cdn.unitycms.io/image/ocroped/1200,1200,1000,1000,0,...
Massey-Harris is now Massey-Ferguson, but still makes tractors and manure spreaders. It's a single person job now: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/Ma...
The steps across from the Alhambra are gone: https://www.google.com/maps/@46.2028417,6.1463583,3a,90y,180... but Chillon (like Lavaux?) hasn't changed much :-) https://www.google.com/maps/@46.412932,6.9292024,3a,75y,180h...
left:
(french left, german right):
in 1959 by 650'000 votes
the swiss people said
NO
to women's suffrage
(then)
Geneva
must remain united with switzerland, vote
NO
united at the ballot box!
vote
NO
Ticinesi of Geneva
all should vote
NO
middle: NO, NO, NO, etc.
Don't mix up our women in political strife
They have more noble tasks to accomplish
right: Citizens! (NB: male only)
Beware of words, regard the facts!
- Men and women are equal in the civil realm but they have different spheres.
- Politics already divides men, don't mix women up in it.
- Leave the woman out of politics, that's how she'll be useful to the country and secure her interests.
- A woman does better to hear her voice in her own home than in a political party.
- Of course men will vote for social laws that protect women.
Unite, don't divide
vote NO> A release by Kodak showcased that most film has around 13 stops of dynamic range. Today’s modern digital cameras all average around 14 stops of dynamic range, with high-end units such as the Nikon D810 reaching almost 15 stops. Film continuous to deliver incredible dynamic range, but today’s digital technology can easy match it.
Source: https://petapixel.com/2015/05/26/film-vs-digital-a-compariso...
In addition, it felt like all my best shots were 100% luck, only discovered after reviewing them the next day.
It seems like luck (or, maybe, "getting skilled at being lucky") is fundamental to the art.
that's not to say the greats relied only on luck. even my luckiest, one-in-a-million, greatest shot is nothing compared to what Frank left on the cutting room floor of The Americans.
No prints available...? That would be awesome.