undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrunarberg5y ago0 comments

This rhetoric of new nuclear is gonna solve the climate crises reminds of how GMO was poised to increase our food safety and end world hunger.

It didn’t. And since I’ve learned that new technology doesn’t save us when there is an underlying social issue that is causing it. With GMO the issue is food distribution. In the climate disaster the cause is a little more complex but undeniably a few actors are making an unfair amount of money while polluting the climate for the rest of us.

I find more hope in solutions like carbon tax, international agreements, greener infrastructure, and general climate justice, then for an unproven magical technology that will be deployed on top of the existing social problems.

Never underestimate the tendency of the rich to shift the cost to others while keeping the profit. New nuclear is not going to change that.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

throwaway0a5e5y ago· 2 in thread

You ever notice that the countries where the people are pissed off at the rich for taking too much, pissed of at the government and pissed off about climate change are all countries where basically everyone is fed, clothed and has running water and stable electric power?

Advancements in technology (including GMO crops) and productivity in general have massively raised standards of living in the developing world.

Raised standards of living are what permit people to give a crap about things like oppressed people in the next village over and climate change. Reducing the cost of commodities, like energy and grain, by any means raises standards of living, especially at the margins, and is what permits more people to care about abstract things.

runarbergOP5y ago

I’m not sure anything you say here is true:

* I really doubt GMO has raised the standard of living for the average person.

* I really doubt people in less then stable economy have any less salt towards the rich, the government, or polluters.

* I really doubt there is a correlation between the standard of living caring about your neighbors.

So to answer your question. No. I have never noticed that countries where people are pissed at the rich are the people that live in stable economy. To prove you wrong, take a look at Greta Thunberg’s twitter feed. She is constantly retweeting people from poorer countries being pissed at the rich for ruining our climate.

selectodude5y ago

>I really doubt GMO has raised the standard of living for the average person.

Then you are absolutely not paying attention at all whatsoever. In fact, the majority of the impact of GMO crops has been felt in countries where there was literally not enough food to go around. You’re welcome to your organics in a country as food secure as in the west but starving poor and middle income countries is not okay.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4218791/

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse